OOB in new patch 3.5

[DRG]

Ahhh yes. I see now. A slightly different problem than the Icon is wrong.

I'll put it on the to-do list along with the fact the start date for that unit is about 20 years too soon

Don

[DRG]

Just a quick reminder. Andy and I are both taking a nice L O N G break from game development and will be pursing other RL activities until sometime in autumn when we will decide what else we might want to do with the game so although I appreciate "bug spotting" is a cherished, legitimate activity and does serve to warn others of problem it may be worth keeping in mind that a flood of "bug reports" now are going to be buried by October so saving them all up and posting them sometime just after the end of the summer will ensure that they won't be overlooked

Don

[Epoletov_SPR]

It is a pity that you have not guessed to give players for testing Patch 3.5.

In fact it not military secret.
It would exclude simple mistakes.

I hope for understanding and in the future are ready (club SPR and not only we) to test patches before publication !

[DRG]

If you bother to concentrate a bit more on the positive aspect of what was done to the patch instead of every trivial error that you find I might start taking you a bit more seriously. The "errors" that have been found in 3.5 amount to far, far less than .05% of the actual work done on the patch for the game. I can assure you that even if I did follow your recommendations there would still be "errors" found ( whether real or imagined ) becasue after every release, no matter when it was done and no matter how many playtesters we have looking at it, somebody always finds something to ***** about

Don

[Epoletov_SPR]

DRG said:
If you bother to concentrate a bit more on the positive aspect of what was done to the patch instead of every trivial error that you find I might start taking you a bit more seriously. The "errors" that have been found in 3.5 amount to far, far less than .05% of the actual work done on the patch for the game. I can assure you that even if I did follow your recommendations there would still be "errors" found ( whether real or imagined ) becasue after every release, no matter when it was done and no matter how many playtesters we have looking at it, somebody always finds something to ***** about

Don

I to you on business have come, and you here read morals to me.
That is not solid.

Really was so difficultly to allow to look at one, two days a new patch to all interested persons ?

I do not suggest to correct disputable OOBs, and I offer testing for detection of banal errors !