|
|
|
 |

May 30th, 2007, 04:14 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 527
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Illogic of Flight
Quote:
Reverend Zombie said:
What about...flying tramplers???
|
DUNH DUNH DUUUUUUUUUUUNH
|

May 30th, 2007, 04:37 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,741
Thanks: 21
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: The Illogic of Flight
A unit that is flying would not have to move to avoid being trampled! that is the whole point. He is already above the elephant's feet.
you do not trample with your head.
__________________
"War is an art and as such is not susceptible of explanation by fixed formula."
- General George Patton Jr.
|

May 30th, 2007, 04:41 PM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: The Illogic of Flight
I love casting fly on buffed mammoths...... good times.......
|

May 30th, 2007, 04:50 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: The Illogic of Flight
What about the trunk?
Couldn't the elephant swat a flyer with its trunk? Isn't this kind of a trample attack. After all most flyers are fragile, lightly built and a trunk is huge, also surprisingly agile, they eat ickle peanuts with them.
|

May 30th, 2007, 05:10 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,741
Thanks: 21
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: The Illogic of Flight
Eating peanuts is a bit different than hitting a flying target, and also, as someone else already mentioned, not all tramplers have a trunk. I was just using the elephant as an example.
And no, the trunk is a separate attack, it is not like trample.
__________________
"War is an art and as such is not susceptible of explanation by fixed formula."
- General George Patton Jr.
|

May 31st, 2007, 07:26 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh, Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: The Illogic of Flight
At the basic level though, if the flyer is close enough for a melee attack, it's close enough to be attacked back. Who's to say the flier didn't collide with the trampler (imagine the effect of a crow flying into a charging elephant...) and KO itself, or the trampler simply swatting the flier out of the air and proceeding to jump up and down on them?
You don't really need to model a mechanism to take this kind of thing into account to be honest. A dodge chance for fliers (assuming they're agile enough. Not all natural fliers are necessarily good fliers)would be sufficient.
|

May 31st, 2007, 11:34 AM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,741
Thanks: 21
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: The Illogic of Flight
But that is what i am saying, if the flyer is in melee range, then let the trampler have its normal attack versus the flier rather than a trample. I am not implying that the trampler cannot attack the flier, but i think the appropriate attack is the trunk(in the case of the elephant) not a trample.
Makes more sense, and is easy to do. And not all flyers are small birds. Take the gorgon for instance. She is not going to be swatted anywhere by a trunk attack, assuming she and other skilled fliers are clumsy enough to get hit by a trunk.
I think those charcoal demons would fly and come in from behind to attack. They just do not look dumb enough to fly straight in and smack into the elephant like a bug on a car windshield.
__________________
"War is an art and as such is not susceptible of explanation by fixed formula."
- General George Patton Jr.
|

May 31st, 2007, 02:13 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: The Illogic of Flight
Still following Xietor's logic on this one. Most tramplers have relatively effective melee attacks anyway, so it wouldn't be like fliers were their bane,... although one could use fliers to distract tramplers by forcing them to use their melee attacks rather than crushing whole squads of heavy infantry. The dragonfly swarm spell, for instance, would be quite useful against elephants. To me, that makes sense, since elephants would be rather distracted by large flying creatures biting/slashing/stabbing at them and might not manage to trample the main enemy force of infantry when thus harassed.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|