Armadillo - started

Fal · #1 June 3rd, 2007, 09:57 AM

count me in please. MA sounds good.

Will take either Man or any of the underwater nations.

Would also like to see graph disabled, but that's up to other players.

GameExtremist · #2 June 3rd, 2007, 10:19 AM

Count me in - I'm okay with MA

I'd like Arcoscephale

I'd like Victory conditions set, not picky about them though.

PashaDawg · #3 June 3rd, 2007, 10:22 AM

I'd be interested in playing.

What turn schedule are you thinking? I tend to prefer slower games, such as:

Turns 1 - 15 : daily
Turns 16 - End: 48 hour or 3 times per week

(If other players would prefer a fast game, then I can step aside for someone else.

)

Victory conditions with % of map would be good.

It would be fun to play middle age. I'd like Agartha, Eriu, Bandar Log, or Ulm.

Pasha

Sieger · #4 June 3rd, 2007, 10:29 AM

I'd be interested in playing.

My nation preferences would be:

EA: Niefelheim
MA: Ermor, R'lyeh, Pythium
LA: R'lyeh, Pangaea

Dedas · #5 June 3rd, 2007, 10:31 AM

I would like to play!

EA - C'tis
MA - Ulm
LA - Not decided yet

Sir_Dr_D · #6 June 3rd, 2007, 11:07 AM

My preference is early age, but since middle age has been the most popular vote right now, how about we say this will be A MA game. It is much easier to pick a nation if I know the age.

I will give my nation choices later.

Sir_Dr_D · #7 June 3rd, 2007, 11:58 AM

If it is middle age I would like to be Agartha.

Early age then R'lyey.

LA then Jomon.

llamabeast · #8 June 3rd, 2007, 12:15 PM

I guess we should choose a map, and a number of players.

How about 'Glory of the Gods (multiplayer)' - 227 lands, 47 seas. I haven't played on it myself, so opinions are welcome.

If we go for that map, I'd suggest 12 land nations and 2 sea nations. Again, anyone have any thoughts?

Oh, and let's say it will be an MA game, since that seems to be the consensus.

Kristoffer - do you realise you've listed the 4 nations generally considered (as far as I've heard) to be the weakest in MA?