Re: Gryphin and Growltigga Thread
Mac,
The scientific research which you have cited is convincing and I am finding myself having to review and question my earlier decisions. The delightful woman, Ms. Fyre, offers first hand evidence in support of the view that the item in question is in fact a Moustache, but her subsequent statements throw doubt upon impartiality of her testimony. Given these doubts, the court should consider accepting the Woolly Caterpillar explanation for the observed phenomenon.
Members of the court will clearly wish to know the grounds upon which Ms. Fyre has lost her accreditation as an unbiased observer and may be shocked to learn that she shares anti-Canadian views with the questionable Mr. Tigga. However, she has slandered the “large black furry hat like objects found on the militia on a small island”, exposing her true colours. For those of you who are unaware, these hats are of Canadian origin, as the English exterminated all wild bears on their island by the Middle Ages. While bear baiting continued as a popular sport (continued in modern form as Tigga baiting), these animals were European imports.
As such, Ms. Fyre has clearly indicated that she harbours latent anti-Canadianism and we must take her views with this in mind. Given the widespread anti-Canadianism present in the media today, the figure skating scandal being but one example, it is not surprising to find it occurring in witnesses of the court. Moreover, Ms. Fyre is clearly of otherwise good character and loves small children, so this member of the jury is inclined to give the benefit of the doubt to her.
As such, I will confirm my declaration that the object in said photo is in fact a Moustache and not a Woolly Caterpillar. Those who wish to look upon this logic with condescension may go and have condensation fall upon them.
|