|
|
|
 |

June 21st, 2007, 11:54 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 746
Thanks: 36
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Discordance - Random Nations, Late Era (Signup
Quote:
Shovah32 said:
Or we could all just consider your blackmail offensive and launch a combined attack on you, making sure Rlyeh wins(as opposed to you winning, which is the likely case if rlyeh goes down).
|
I doubt if the nation of R'lyeh will crumble into the sea because we overcast arcane nexus, but to each their own propaganda. If you see it as one or the other, make your choice then! We promise not to neglect your lands! 
|

June 21st, 2007, 01:02 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Discordance - Random Nations, Late Era (Signup
although it may appears Ermor is the second strongest nation on graph, I don't see it as a particular threat at the moment, in fact it is rather fragile. So imo to make above so called decree was really not such a good idea, it would have been more effective if the leader of Ermor attempted to awake his fellow nations' anti-r'lyeh awareness, instead blackmailing all of us for the personal gain.
I guess that's the very nature of the undead. 
__________________
If you gotta shoot, shoot, don't talk.
|

June 21st, 2007, 01:05 PM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Discordance - Random Nations, Late Era (Signup
Quote:
LoloMo said:
Quote:
Shovah32 said:
Or we could all just consider your blackmail offensive and launch a combined attack on you, making sure Rlyeh wins(as opposed to you winning, which is the likely case if rlyeh goes down).
|
I doubt if the nation of R'lyeh will crumble into the sea because we overcast arcane nexus, but to each their own propaganda. If you see it as one or the other, make your choice then! We promise not to neglect your lands!
|
You may have read something into my post but i never said i expected Rlyeh to go down with the nexus. I was simply pointing out that its obvious your rallying(or trying to do so) various nations against the biggest threat to your position.
|

July 10th, 2007, 08:45 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 746
Thanks: 36
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Discordance - Random Nations, Late Era (Signup
I would like to request for a longer time between turns. This is my first time playing LA Ermor, and the sheer mass of units to be organized and given orders is unbelievable.
Adding one more day or bringing it up to 72 hours would be great!
|

July 10th, 2007, 11:42 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,122
Thanks: 5
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Discordance - Random Nations, Late Era (Signup
Given the speed I decimate your forces that should not be a problem.
|

July 26th, 2007, 05:17 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,122
Thanks: 5
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Discordance - Random Nations, Late Era (Signup
I'm sick and I propose that we postpone the hosting till Evilhomer can find a new sub.
|

July 26th, 2007, 08:01 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 746
Thanks: 36
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Discordance - Random Nations, Late Era (Signup
Given the way I've won the last 10 or so consecutive battles using minimal mages that should not be a problem
Just a barb right back  I'm ok with the wait while we find a sub.
|

August 3rd, 2007, 06:58 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,122
Thanks: 5
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Discordance - Random Nations, Late Era (Signup
I'm pleased to see that you changed the host time from 72h till 48h while I was sick so that I would miss more turns. Now that I'm back you may change it back to 72h as there is nothing to gain from 48h.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|