|
|
|
 |

June 26th, 2007, 02:40 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,066
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: SE4 Advanced brainstorming
Web Mines are good. I haven't finished implementing a good warhead and mine system yet. They'll probably exist as Ion Warheads just to be consistent with existing SE4 tech.
I already have several facilities in the Psych area that lower anger, increase production, and decrease the chance of bad events or intel. It might be interesting to have a mobile ship component that does something similar.
|

June 26th, 2007, 02:44 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,066
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: SE4 Advanced brainstorming
The organic racial trait and the psychic racial trait depend heavily on the Biotech and Psychology trees respectively. I currently need more low-end (1-5) and high-end (20-30) stuff for normal races on those trees.
I also haven't settled on a ship hull size scheme yet. Right now I'm using stock hulls. Like regular SE4 they get progressively bigger. But this may change. What do you think?
|

June 26th, 2007, 07:15 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Advanced brainstorming
Gritecon style hulls are a good alternative.
Use maintenance reduction abilities and component scale mounts to make the average ship cost (ie build time) be proportional to size squared.
The average ship maintenance cost can at the same time be proportional to the square root of the size.
Then you can give all the ship hulls right from the beginning, and they'll get used.
__________________
Things you want:
|

June 27th, 2007, 12:36 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,066
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: SE4 Advanced brainstorming
That's not a bad idea. I may do something similar, but I probably won't use the system as it is. I want to avoid scale mounts. Just a personal preference.
|

June 27th, 2007, 06:46 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Advanced brainstorming
Well, it really isn't doable without mounts.
You could mix it with the P&N style "budget" "normal" and "premium" component mounts if you wanted to... that would hide the scale mountness of it.
__________________
Things you want:
|

June 30th, 2007, 02:52 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,066
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: SE4 Advanced brainstorming
Are there any bugs in SE4 that you'd like to see corrected in SE4 Advanced?
Obviously I can't mess with the .exe, but there are a lot of things I can do by stretching the data files.
|

June 30th, 2007, 10:29 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Advanced brainstorming
Well, if it is just in the datafiles it probably isn't a bug per se.
Intel and mines are the biggest issues, IMO. Too much of an "all-or-nothing" system there.
For mines, I suggest removing minesweepers completely, and then limiting mines to 15 per sector and enough damage per mine to deal no more than 5% damage to a ship.
That way, minefields have to be spread around in a system, along common paths, and in rings around high value locations, rather than just piling them all up on warppoints and colonies.
The mines won't vaporize fleets, but they are guaranteed to at least do some damage and slow the enemy down when they're in your territory.
Intel...
Definitely have a "saboteurs" tech area which is disableable in the game setup. All offensive projects should require this tech, which starts at max level.
Then turning off damaging intel is one click away for the game masters who don't want it.
Sticking with just spying operations makes intel less overwhelming, but still useful.
Counter intel will also need to be reworked, eliminated or converted to "intel sabotage" projects so that you can't just make a magic wall against spies.
Having helpful intel projects to use on your friends is also a nice idea. For example:
- Officer Exchange Program: INCREASES the target ship's experience by +1%
- Polluter sabotage: INCREASES the target planet's conditions rating by a small amount.
Increasing the target's happiness is a good one too. Propaganda project maybe?
There aren't too many intel projects which actually work in reverse. Supply drain for example can't be negative, unfortunately.
__________________
Things you want:
|

July 1st, 2007, 07:50 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Advanced brainstorming
We're talking about drones here, they don't combine into stacks.
|

July 1st, 2007, 08:13 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Advanced brainstorming
Right. Mines would, drones wouldn't.
__________________
Things you want:
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|