|
|
|
 |

May 12th, 2007, 11:36 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Penetration vs Smite
Hi all,
Is penetration bonus works on a priest that cast smite? I'm thinking of lizard king with penetration bonus for better smiting power.
|

May 12th, 2007, 12:44 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 651
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Penetration vs Smite
AS far as I know, yes. Penetrations bonuses apply to any and all spells that can be resisted with a MR check.
|

August 20th, 2007, 04:49 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 179
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Penetration vs Smite
I guess the original question referred to the focus amulet that gives 1 penetration (are there other items that give penetration?)
What good is this really? I have no experience in this, but does +1 really make any difference that is wortwhile the gem cost plus the fact that it takes up a slot?
|

August 20th, 2007, 05:04 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Penetration vs Smite
Yes, it does.
Consider spells like Soul Slay, Charm, etc. Save or die - or worse! These are the main counter to supercombatants. Mass enough mages, and one will eventually get through. Due to how the Dominions system works, going a little bit higher will make the chance of success a lot better in some cases, and not noticiably better in others, but it never hurts.
|

August 20th, 2007, 05:12 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Penetration vs Smite
Probably not worth it for a smiter, though.
|

August 20th, 2007, 06:53 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Penetration vs Smite
Smite only affects one unit. And check that table on page 5.
So, I'd avoid adding penetration to smiters, usually. Though if I had an area attack-mr spell, a 6-15% change in results can be handy. I might equip them for single target spells if I have some unit I need to take out with the units available- but I wouldn't dedicate it to a smiter, since smite is usually good enough for most small fry, and more smiters are much better than a small change in percentage.
Ctis:
Barring special occasions, I'd give the penetration items to my Sauromancers/Marshmasters/etc - units capable of casting shadow blast, or other similar spells. Lizard Kings will find penetration items useful, but in most circumstances your mages will make better use of it.
|

August 21st, 2007, 01:34 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Penetration vs Smite
Quote:
thejeff said:
Probably not worth it for a smiter, though.
|
Worthwhile for any level_3 or higher casting banishment.
__________________
There can be only one.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|