.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 16th, 2007, 05:18 PM
Ragnarok-X's Avatar

Ragnarok-X Ragnarok-X is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany / Bielefeld
Posts: 2,035
Thanks: 33
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Ragnarok-X is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: OT: Computer benchmarks

Thanks for your thoughts.
I almost forgot than i can overcloak my stuff lol. So, before i get new components, i will use the various tools to get a slightly better performance, should it be needed.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old September 16th, 2007, 07:51 PM

AstralWanderer AstralWanderer is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 131
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
AstralWanderer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: OT: Computer benchmarks

Baron Munchausen reminisced:
Good god... do you realize that I am reading this on an Asus A7V133 with a 1.2 Ghz Duron and a mere Matrox G450 video card? Yes, a six year old computer. It works fine.


Hah! I'm making this post using a hundred-year old abacus, where you have to arrange the beads to form the ASCII values for each character - including the brackets for HTML tags.

(Disclaimer: Not really, using a 7-year old 1Ghz PIII laptop with a Geforge2Go 32MB graphics card - runs SEV OK generally though).

Fyron quoteth:
Isn't the only real difference between the geforce 7xxx line and 8xxx line DX10 support? Maybe some marginally faster speeds on various components? DX10 support matters naught if you don't upgrade to Vista, and is only relevant for 2 or 3 games so (including titles in the works).


The top end (8800) cards offer a more significant speed boost, comparable to a couple of 7800/7900's in SLI plus improvements to image quality (e.g. the ability to use High Dynamic Range lighting with anti-aliasing enabled which the 7xxx series can't do). Mid-range (8600/8400) cards apparently perform worse than the previous generation though (as do their ATI equivalents) making the 7900/X1900 series the better choice for medium level systems.

However whether an upgrade is a good idea or not depends on what you are using your system for. If you have a large monitor for instance and want to run a graphically demanding game (e.g. Oblivion, Stalker) with good quality settings, then a graphics upgrade may be worthwhile - but for a future game, it would make more sense to wait until after it's launched (prices will be lower, more details on what the game needs will be available).

As for CPUs, a highly overclockable quad-core (e.g. G0 stepping of the Q6600) should provide more power in theory, but the reality will depend on what you run and how much concurrency you really need.

As for benchmarks, ones using the games you play are going to be the most important. There are synthetic benchmarks aplenty though (e.g. Sandra, 3DMark) if you want to give those a spin...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.