|
|
|
 |

September 25th, 2007, 09:29 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: country of stinky fromages
Posts: 564
Thanks: 29
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion to autocasting search spells
Are you sure they avoid provinces with sites ? It seems to me they avoid all provinces that have been searched other way by a mage. Quite frustrating to have to hand pick provinces just because you had a 1X mage searching into it at the beginning of the game.
__________________
10 times more numerous, by nigth and backstabbing.
Senior member of the GLIN !
|

September 25th, 2007, 09:31 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,122
Thanks: 5
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion to autocasting search spells
They avoid provinces with two or more sites and any provinces that have been searched.
The priority of terrain is probably even better but propably more demanding to implement.
|

September 25th, 2007, 09:47 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion to autocasting search spells
Yeah, the terrain priority is an ideal. I'd also like a pony.
Essentially, I'm eventually going to want to search everything anyway. If I really care about the order, it's likely when I have minimal income and I'm trying to get enough gems to finance the rest of the site searches. Or I'm trying to avoid searching vulnerable provinces. That I'm going to do manually anyway.
Other than that I want it to search everywhere that could have sites. Skip capitals, skip anything already searched to lvl 4, skip anything with 4 sites already found. That's it.
Don't get me wrong. I love autocasting search spells. It's a drastic drop in micromanagement. Fixing it so I don't have to scroll through the province list to see if anything has been missed is all I care about adding. Efficiency improvements to the order are just icing on the cake.
|

September 25th, 2007, 09:48 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion to autocasting search spells
The most annoying thing to me is that they tend to search from South to North and I'm almost always fighting South, so they always try to search provinces right on the border, meaning I have to manually do it every time, or potentially give my enemy free sites.
|

September 25th, 2007, 10:07 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion to autocasting search spells
How are you always fighting South?
|

September 25th, 2007, 10:15 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 687
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Suggestion to autocasting search spells
I eighth this notion!
no sites
1 site
2 sites
3 sites
Searched by lvl 1
Searched by lvl 2
Searched by lvl 3
Always skip capitals
|

September 25th, 2007, 10:45 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion to autocasting search spells
Do we understand the site placing algorithm well enough to say that there's a better chance of finding a site in province with less known sites than in one with more known sites?
Or is it just the statistics I don't understand...
|

September 25th, 2007, 11:40 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion to autocasting search spells
Quote:
jutetrea said:
I eighth this notion!
no sites
1 site
2 sites
3 sites
Searched by lvl 1
Searched by lvl 2
Searched by lvl 3
Always skip capitals
|
I would also like this implemented.
|

September 25th, 2007, 12:04 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion to autocasting search spells
I don't understand the desire to prioritize searches of provinces with no known sites.
The site placing algorithm, as I understand it is:
roll %chance of site
if yes, determine which site then roll again
if no then exit.
Max of 4 sites, but the point is, if there you know there is one site, the chances of another site are just as good as when you didn't know of any.
I'd much rather search a Waste site (+20%) that already had 3 sites than a farm (-10%) that had none.
Am I missing something?
|

September 25th, 2007, 12:00 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion to autocasting search spells
Quote:
llamabeast said:
How are you always fighting South?
|
Just unlucky I guess. It's annoying you can't switch the direction around.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|