Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN

[Hadrian_II]

Lord_Bob said:
I'm not playing everyone in some bizarre wierdness. Shovah32 wanted to play me MA Bandar versus whatever, and I'm perfectly willing to do that today. I'll play EvilHomer Patala versus T'ien Ch'i today if Shovah can't play today. Six hours from now would be fine.

Too Bad

[llamabeast]

I don't think there is much point in playing Patala vs T'ien Ch'i. As EvilHomer says, T'ien Ch'i probably is a stronger nation, although not particularly because of its PD. MA Ulm vs Bandar Log would be much more meaningful, because many of us feel that Bandar Log would have an advantage, whereas you are certain that Bandar Log can NEVER WIN.

[Folket]

That reminds me that I won a blitz with Bandar Log against Ermor and Pangaea, who are both considered strong MA nations.

[llamabeast]

Oh! Wow Folket. Well in that case I guess the whole thread is disproved.

If you would submit your win to the Victorious Nations thread it would make me very happy.

[Evilhomer]

Duels, blitzes etc are not reported usually to the victorious nation thread, would just flood it I fear

[Folket]

Shall we start recording all duel and blitz wins there? That will give more number but I think it will only start to show what nations people like to play.

In general I do not find the monkey troops that weak. I have played Bandar Log and Patala in MP with fair success.

[Evilhomer]

Might be a plan to have them in a seperate stickied thread. I do belive you have an ordinary game with LA marignon unreported anyway...

[Folket]

that is true. I should report that at a time.

[NTJedi]

Evilhomer said:
Might be a plan to have them in a seperate stickied thread. I do belive you have an ordinary game with LA marignon unreported anyway...

Blitzes should definitely be recorded seperately perhaps in the same sticky, but one or two posts further down.