Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN

[Boron]

Lord_Bob said:
But they are VERY VERY LOW RESOURCE COST. So they can be spammed out aggressively.

I wouldn't call 20 resources low resource cost.

Unfortunately only the ulm guys have even higher resource costs but they also get +25% resources as nation bonus.
So 1 ulm guy takes ulm about as long to produce as another nation an elephant if they have equal production scales.

The elephants are problematic though since they are so devastating. If the elephant user can amass a critical mass of elephants he usually wipes out your whole army and takes nearly zero own casualities.

I don't do tests anymore, but i guess with decent LI that can be produced as fast as the elephants at equal gold costs the LI has a fair chance of winning. Anything that costs only 1-3 resources in huge masses.

[Evilhomer]

Elephants are rather low on resources, if you compare the gold/resource ratio (which is really what you want to do).

[Folket]

Keep this up and this thread will have more posts then the bug thread in a week.

[Evilhomer]

Bug thread has 13 replies, so it is not that hard to beat.

[Valandil]

Umm... so, best I can tell, Monkey nations can win, and have done so. This thread might as well die.

[Folket]

Evilhomer...

1300 replies to the bug thread. You should get some new glasses. Or did you not learn that zeroes at the end of number do have a meaning in school?

[Sombre]

You're both right, the Bug Thread has both 13 and 1300+ replies.