Question - Fire Control and Range Finders

[PlasmaKrab]

pdoktar said:
Hmm.. not sure about "bad" hitting of moving targets. Given that RR´s were designed to engage armored vehicles, that are seldom stationary in combat, I doubt that it´s inherently worse at engaging moving targets than say AT-guns. Of course their muzzle velocity is slower, but this should be already considered in its accuracy rating.

I agree that the RF should remain low, but 5 is not exactly top-range even in the 60s. In my tables, it's the FC of an early T-54 or early Patton, and one notch above an RPG-7.
If you want to try out M-40 RRs with, say, 8 RF and 3 FC if that makes more sense to you, I'd be interested in seeing the difference.