Version 3.08 Newbie game (finished)

[cupido2]

Or we make an agreement against cruelty and act as idols for other games:

Treaty

We, the noble nations of Man and R'lyeh agree hereby to the following points

1)Weapons of massdestruction like the Tartarians and the items that support the weapons of massdestruction like the Chalice and the Aegis are considered unmoral and inhuman and are herefor banned.

2) Slavery is considered a crime against humanity so all blood slaves have to be freed within 1 turn.

3) Weapons, skills or magic that mingles with the mind of beeings, be they living or undead, like Master enslave or charm are considered as slavery and are herefor forbidden.

4) The right for life and propriety is granted. Only artifical and mindless beeings are allowed to fight in battles. All artifacts found or obtained from the opponent have to be given back at once.

5) The civil population must stay untouched under all circumstances. Every spell or artifact that harms the population of a province and all pillaging and blood hunting is strictly forbidden.

R'lyeh: Man:
Basalt citadel, the 566/3435/49 AD Place/date

+Haukar (sign here)

[Cor2]

Hmm. While this is brilliant. We must refuse. Although we really like #3 we are in contrvention of all the rest. I believe that Man's total count of constructs is around 30. It would make for a very short war. On the other hand we suspect that Rlyeh has a huge stockpile of Golems.

This is a holy war after all. It will decide the fate of all living things on the world for the rest of eternity (or until dominions 4 comes out). Any maens are justified.
*rips up document* This is total war!

[cupido2]

What an offence! And that before Christmas! I hope Santa reads this this forums! I declare myself the moral winner!! Hooray! (Whew he seems to have 30 more constructs than I have.)

O.k. next proposal: We settle this matter like the noble barbarians did. You wish for a deathmatch and we both send our best warrior to the fight. The one that wins, wins the war. No unnecessary bloodshed.

[lch]

O.k. next proposal: We settle this matter like the noble barbarians did. You wish for a deathmatch and we both send our best warrior to the fight. The one that wins, wins the war. No unnecessary bloodshed.

I'd like to see that!

[Cor2]

The trial by combat idea wouldn't work because I have the Champion's trident already. That commander has to go and he is far from my best.

I say we trade the chalice until someone runs out of gems, its mine next.

Are you tired of the game? you can always concede.

[cupido2]

Would discarding the trident work?

No, no, don't get me wrong. I always fight to the end of a game (even in that game where I was Lanka and my only province for about 20 turns was a swamp with 0 income, lol, that teaches you modesty), I just try to win by all the means I have (diplomacy is all that you left me).

Btw I read a thread about communions and didn't get it what was written there. I remember that in my first mp (where you were Arco and I Abysia) you used those communions. So, how does that work exactly and how is that secret magic buff calculated?

[Cor2]

For ever 4 (i think may be 5 or 6) communicants the effective path level of the master raises by one. It will not be shown in the battle but it will have an effect on strength of spells as well a fatigue that is accumulated.

The fatiuge from the master is spread out among communicants ( the master will still get a little fatigue). It is very easy to kill the communion slaves from fatigue. So its better to have alot of slaves and only one or two masters.

Any personal effect spell that is cast by the master (such as twist of fate or fire shield) effects the communicants as well.

Communicants will cast spells if they act before the master so its best to script them to do nothing.

Is that what you wanted to know? Does that make sense?

Discarding the trident by suicide would work.
I will think about it. I do have a contender or two.