|
|
|
|
|
December 23rd, 2007, 02:01 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 739
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth vs Starvation?
Quote:
Wick said:
It still seems like a bug. Checking their hunger against the base supplies of the province wouldn't give them away but would stop large armies passing through the Carrion Woods, where even the plants are undead.
|
Actually, I think it *SHOULD* give them away! If you truly want to sneak an army through you should have to bring food as the locals would note the missing food.
|
December 23rd, 2007, 03:24 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth vs Starvation?
Quote:
Loren said:
Actually, I think it *SHOULD* give them away! If you truly want to sneak an army through you should have to bring food as the locals would note the missing food.
|
However, that'd also mean that if your enemy was using stealth armies against you, the best way to fight them would be to check all of your provinces every turn, and see how much supplies are used. EVERY TURN!
Doing something very boring and very unfun shouldn't give benefits that can't be gotten other ways.
|
December 23rd, 2007, 05:50 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 481
Thanks: 42
Thanked 33 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth vs Starvation?
IMO, there should be some kind of check against a province's supply level, just to represent a stealth army's ability to live off the land or not.
A large, sneaky force might be able to forage and steal enough food in bountiful farmland, but it's hard to imagine them getting by on just roots and berries in a barren wasteland...
__________________
"I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part"
|
December 23rd, 2007, 03:30 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 739
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth vs Starvation?
Quote:
Endoperez said:
Quote:
Loren said:
Actually, I think it *SHOULD* give them away! If you truly want to sneak an army through you should have to bring food as the locals would note the missing food.
|
However, that'd also mean that if your enemy was using stealth armies against you, the best way to fight them would be to check all of your provinces every turn, and see how much supplies are used. EVERY TURN!
Doing something very boring and very unfun shouldn't give benefits that can't be gotten other ways.
|
No. I wouldn't alter the numbers on the screen, I would just have a message if the province was in starvation due to them. "Inexplicably, the units in <x> can't find enough food."
How about an order for stealth units: Eat. Their supply consumption increases say 3x or 5x, although this will not cause starvation amongst *THEIR* units.
|
December 23rd, 2007, 08:19 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth vs Starvation?
One possible solution would be to cause starvation in sneaking units in enemy territory, but not update the display of available supplies when the owner of the province looks at it. And since the stealth units are sneaking, they get last dibs on the twigs and berries, so standing armies of the owner won't starve (normally) either.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
December 24th, 2007, 03:14 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Texas/Ohio
Posts: 363
Thanks: 11
Thanked 72 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth vs Starvation?
Hmmm... I think so far this thread isn't understanding how I understand the supply mechanic. First off, its population based. If it weren't, it be reasonable to think "twig and berry" supply would be HIGHER in lower population provinces. Instead, supply is not just salvaging, but things like villages baking bread, preparing horse feed, etc. Basically, the products of industry.
So where do stealth armies fit into this equation. Not a clue. I'm pretty sure I've seen some of my stealth armies suffer stravation before, but its been a long time.
|
December 31st, 2007, 04:11 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth vs Starvation?
I had a single stealth commander suffer from and die of starvation when sneaking around in enemy terrain.
|
December 31st, 2007, 05:05 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth vs Starvation?
Commanders can't starve, ever. At least I don't remember ever seeing my commanders starve, or get diseased from it. He could have passed through a province with Inkpot End in it.
|
December 31st, 2007, 12:55 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth vs Starvation?
Quote:
Endoperez said:
Commanders can't starve, ever. At least I don't remember ever seeing my commanders starve, or get diseased from it. He could have passed through a province with Inkpot End in it.
|
Endo is right... commanders will never starve.
__________________
There can be only one.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|