|
|
|
View Poll Results: What do you think of this theory?
|
Me like!
|
  
|
4 |
36.36% |
Dude...you're on crack. Go beat your head against the wall, it'd be more productive.
|
  
|
5 |
45.45% |
Why do you think I care?
|
  
|
2 |
18.18% |
 |

January 10th, 2008, 10:41 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Gravity, Dark Energy, Universal expansion
One of the most basic assumptions of relativity is that all inertial reference frames are equally valid. Simply choose your inertial reference frame to be one where the sun is motionless, and you can trivially show that the speed of gravity makes virtually no difference to the influence of the sun on any of its planets. Working out how this is compensated for in other reference frames is a bit more work, but the conclusion is guaranteed unless relativity is wrong.
For the speed of gravity to have a significant effect on gravitational interactions, both masses must be large enough to have significant effects on each other so that both have significant acceleration and no inertial reference frame exists where either body is reasonably close to at rest.
|

January 10th, 2008, 02:11 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Gravity, Dark Energy, Universal expansion
That's a better description than I could find anywhere else 
__________________
Things you want:
|

January 12th, 2008, 01:01 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Gravity, Dark Energy, Universal expansion
...What about the inertial reference frame of one object being pulled by the other, which is pulled by the other one...
Sure, it's recursive. But some recursives do have solutions.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|

January 12th, 2008, 06:13 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Gravity, Dark Energy, Universal expansion
By definition, inertial reference frames can not be accelerated. So, an object being accelerated does not have its own inertial reference frame.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|