January 25th, 2008, 07:55 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Fort Retreat Survival --> call for discussion
Quote:
cleveland said:
Quote:
vfb said:
Sure, if you want to take the chance that nothing's teleporting into/attacking the provinces around your fort...
...and if you've got somewhere to retreat to...
...If there's still somewhere to retreat to...
...Annihilation of his fort defenders can happen when there is no avenue of retreat.
|
Following that line of reasoning, why then can't a defender freely reinforce/evacuate an unsurrounded fortress?
Edit @Sombre: It just seems grossly unthematic to me, and an interesting point of discussion.
|
Quote:
thejeff said:
Because during the battle there is chaos and confusion, mostly clustered around the gates. And afterwards, the invaders are busy looting the city. Either way no one notices a few stragglers fleeing.
During the siege, the attackers are spread out camped around the castle, watching for attacks and reinforcements.
|
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
Threaded Mode