|
|
|
 |

March 23rd, 2002, 04:22 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Asteroid System strategy
Umm, can't you make RW/SW in systems with planets?
|

March 23rd, 2002, 11:10 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Asteroid System strategy
IF: yeah, you can build a RW/SW in systems with planets. Our Posts were around the same time, so I never saw the one right before mine.  My point was just that I hate missing out on such high-value planets when they don't come from anywhere else.
__________________
The Unpronounceable Krsqk
"Well, sir, at the moment my left processor doesn't know what my right is doing." - Freefall
|

March 24th, 2002, 06:11 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Asteroid System strategy
Krsqk:
Actually, my question was in regard to this statement:
quote: you gotta' figure the cost benefits of RW/SW's vs reconstruction. IMO, asteroid fields with small numbers should be candidates for RW/SW unless of course it has 3 stars. Then definitely RW/SW
not what you had said. I was fairly certain that you could do both types of stellar manipulation in the same system (never having actually done either msyelf in SEIV). His statement confused me.
|

March 24th, 2002, 06:37 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Asteroid System strategy
Sorry. I was confused by your confusion. How confusing. 
__________________
The Unpronounceable Krsqk
"Well, sir, at the moment my left processor doesn't know what my right is doing." - Freefall
|

March 24th, 2002, 06:46 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Asteroid System strategy
lol!
|

March 24th, 2002, 10:01 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Asteroid System strategy
you gotta' figure the cost benefits of RW/SW's vs reconstruction. IMO, asteroid fields with small numbers should be candidates for RW/SW unless of course it has 3 stars. Then definitely RW/SW quote:
Excuse me, folks, but what the heck is RW/SW? Looks like naval warfare ensignia!
|

March 24th, 2002, 05:12 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Asteroid System strategy
RingWorld/SphereWorld (aka Dyson Sphere)
The best way to go about it, of course is to do both. Build some planets, then build the sphereworld.
Use atmosphere converters rather than smash/rebuild once your sphereworld is built.
__________________
Things you want:
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|