|
|
|
 |

March 1st, 2008, 01:15 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 202
Thanks: 98
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Should SC\'s autorout?
Perhaps because the dying skeleton is only 50% of the army  .
So I assume you need 3 units to die before your last unit would auto rout.
That is a bit weird.
|

March 1st, 2008, 02:12 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Texas/Ohio
Posts: 363
Thanks: 11
Thanked 72 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Should SC\'s autorout?
If my memory serves, the entire army routs once 75% casualties are reached, whether or not that includes 99 morale units I'm not sure. As for the single skeleton, it'd only be 50% of the troops, so there's that.
|

March 1st, 2008, 06:50 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 792
Thanks: 28
Thanked 45 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Should SC\'s autorout?
Putting your SC in the right place to do the right things is part of the strategy, so don't use them to defend a province if your PD is going to cause him to rout before he's done his thing.
What you could do is try casting beserk, as I think beserk units carry on fighting even when the army routs. If your SC then beats the enemy, I don't know whether the winner is the player who routs last or has the last man standing, but your opponent will barely have an army left.
|

March 1st, 2008, 07:29 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Should SC\'s autorout?
Last man standing wins.
Not using an SC to defend a province if your PD is going to cause him to rout is a good idea, because of the current game mechanics. However, these particular game mechanics do interfere with my suspension of disbelief, and I'd probably enjoy the game even more if nonsensical actions (like the SC in the PD case routing) did not occur.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|

March 1st, 2008, 07:33 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 437
Thanks: 18
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Should SC\'s autorout?
Quote:
Agema said:
Putting your SC in the right place to do the right things is part of the strategy, so don't use them to defend a province if your PD is going to cause him to rout before he's done his thing.
|
Wait till your SC "does his thing" and in the process kills his own PD and then routs before the attacking enemy reaches him 
|

March 1st, 2008, 07:54 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Should SC\'s autorout?
Well, that's not so bad. He's fleeing because he's embarrassed and wants to get out of there before anyone recognizes him.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|