|
|
|
 |

March 6th, 2008, 09:58 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: sweden
Posts: 249
Thanks: 15
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Oh, I wouldnt say that. Ive had some great times with ulm.
|

March 6th, 2008, 10:02 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Hehe, in SP I guess 
|

March 6th, 2008, 10:15 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: La La Land (California, USA)
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Once upon the time, I challenged people to duels to show them how utterly
worthless Ulm is. Later, I wrote long posts explaining why Ulm's troops suck,
and backed them up with probabilities. Even more recently, I ran battles in which
Ulm mighty and finely equipped warriors were whipped by non-sacred, build anywhere
troops like principles, men at arms and defenders.
And still, there are those who chime in with 'Oh, Ulm is not so bad'.
So I have decided not to engage in rational discussion anymore. My answer now is
'Shut up you newbie, you have no idea what you are talking about'.
__________________
No good deed goes unpunished...
|

March 6th, 2008, 10:29 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
I've already seen Ulm winning in MP, it just need an awake great sage to avoid to lose the magic race, some luck for starting position -not being rushed by a neighbour- and not too strong indies (indie 9 or maps like WoG are not good for Ulm).
As your troops are tough you don't need many summons, so you can keep your gems for some globals and/or forge boosters for all your battlefield mages (once you have the level for magma eruption it's sad to continue to cast magma bolts).
The only big ulmish problem is how slow the infantry is. Instead of any other boost I would have given mapmove 2 to all troops without black plate.
|

March 6th, 2008, 11:02 AM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 289
Thanked 194 Times in 94 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Ulm may not have a chance in multiplayer against experienced players, but it is still one of my absolute favorites.
|

March 6th, 2008, 11:51 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Quote:
Ballbarian said:
Ulm may not have a chance in multiplayer against experienced players
|
It's nothing but a legend. If you look in the MP hall of fame you'll see 2 ME Ulm victories, and as I doubt that Wraithlord and CKUnknow play in newbie games it was probably in games with (at least some) experienced players.
There was also an uncounted victory of Ulm in one of the first dom3 games -ended by a bug when Ulm was first in gems and research with 4 or 5 globals up- so weak or not in theory, ME Ulm is only beaten by two or three nations for the number of (not duel) real games won (here, but I think it's the place where you find most experienced players).
Unbelievable isn't it ? (as well as Arco still having 0 victory)
|

March 6th, 2008, 12:26 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kaiserslautern, Germany
Posts: 324
Thanks: 8
Thanked 11 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
i second that Ulm is viable in MP, Now with the new stuff in the patch i think even more
You just have to play them differently like any race in dom3
|

March 6th, 2008, 12:31 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
What's this "Bane of Heresy" thing then?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|