|
|
|
 |

March 8th, 2008, 05:30 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Probably. My perspective is NOT from multiplayer, so I defer to the judgment of more experienced people in that regard. The black steel helmets would be thematically cool, though.
|

March 8th, 2008, 05:48 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 1,377
Thanks: 72
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
I cannot agree with you more. Black steel helmets should be there.
|

March 8th, 2008, 11:10 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Gdansk, Poland
Posts: 420
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Black steel Helmets sound like a no-brainer. Ulm is all about black steel, right ? Why do they use those crappy regular -1 def full helmets ?
__________________
Those who do not understand Master Of Magic are condemned to reinvent it - badly.
|

March 8th, 2008, 03:37 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 566
Thanks: 8
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
I agree with these latest statements.
Though I now beleive that black plate infantry is now quite a good unit, ulm still should have medium infantry with map move 2.
|

March 8th, 2008, 04:18 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Ok, I must be missing something. I do not like Tuidjy's way of lobbying for even more Ulm goodies by disparaging what they just received, but I do not understand why the rest of you are looking for ways of preventing Ulm's troops from shining.
> they would not be such an obvious choice all around
> would really start to hurt them against archers and especially crossbowmen.
> their survivability would go down a lot and their defense woul still stay in the average range
Ulm have forsaken magic. They worship physical strength and masterfully crafted equipment. Why on earth should they not have really good, properly equipped troops?
We are not talking about giving them some out of this world items. We are not even talking about letting them have some infantry with 11s in their stats, although I would not be surprised if Ulm is the only nation that does not have build anywhere veteran infantry.
Tuidjy was just mixing and minimaxing existing equipment. How [censored] dumb are the Ulmish? I guess they hold meetings in which they try to maximize their weaknesses. Right in between 'most cumbersome armor' and 'weakest will' contest, they spend some time choosing weapons that best fail to synegize with their armor.
|

March 8th, 2008, 04:35 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Quote:
Don_Seba said:
Tuidjy was just mixing and minimaxing existing equipment. How [censored] dumb are the Ulmish? I guess they hold meetings in which they try to maximize their weaknesses. Right in between 'most cumbersome armor' and 'weakest will' contest, they spend some time choosing weapons that best fail to synegize with their armor.
|
Actually, the price for dumbest choice of equipment would go for Agarthans. Poor attack and defense, above-average hp and strength, size 3 or bigger makes swarming harder. Clearly high-precision or high-damage weapons are needed, or weapon with multiple attacks. Good shields combined with high hp and units spread over larger area would help a lot against archers. So what's their weapon of choice? Spear and buckler. Surely their giant brethren have something nice, like Great Clubs or Battleaxes? Nope, spears and bucklers. What about their elites? Glaives, for that wonderful malus to both attack and defense. 
|

March 8th, 2008, 05:01 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Quote:
Don_Seba said:
Ok, I must be missing something. I do not like Tuidjy's way of lobbying for even more Ulm goodies by disparaging what they just received, but I do not understand why the rest of you are looking for ways of preventing Ulm's troops from shining.
> they would not be such an obvious choice all around
> would really start to hurt them against archers and especially crossbowmen.
> their survivability would go down a lot and their defense woul still stay in the average range
Ulm have forsaken magic. They worship physical strength and masterfully crafted equipment. Why on earth should they not have really good, properly equipped troops?
We are not talking about giving them some out of this world items. We are not even talking about letting them have some infantry with 11s in their stats, although I would not be surprised if Ulm is the only nation that does not have build anywhere veteran infantry.
Tuidjy was just mixing and minimaxing existing equipment. How [censored] dumb are the Ulmish? I guess they hold meetings in which they try to maximize their weaknesses. Right in between 'most cumbersome armor' and 'weakest will' contest, they spend some time choosing weapons that best fail to synegize with their armor.
|
I did some minmaxing of my own, which is why I do not advocate giving them too well equipped mapmove 2 medium infantry. Plate Cuirass, half helmet and shield is going to be just a couple of prot points less than the chainmail infantry. AND will have better defense AND better mapmove. So which ones were you building again when the chainmail infantry is obsolete?
Better mapmove gives far more tactical and strategic flexibility, which will in the end be so much more important than the higher protection of black plate infantry that the only units anyone will ever build are the medium infantry if they are available.
You can see the same thing in action with EA Ulm, the only actual units worth building with that nation are warrior maidens, steel maidens and shield maidens with iron warriors for heavy hitting built near the front. The other normal warrior units simply suck that much the way they currently are. That is why if you want to keep the MA Ulm heavy units viable, shields are out for medium infantry. Not because it is perfectly logical, but to prevent the nation thematics from being irretrievably broken.
I would not mind black plate infantry having +1 str, att & def compared to the regular infantry, however.
|

March 8th, 2008, 05:27 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 947
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Keep MA Ulm slow. We don't need no stinking "medium" infantry! We are ULM!
Let them keep their 2 map move, "medium" infantry is like saying you are only "sort of" an Ulmish warrior.
Hehe, no seriously, I like variation in the races, with different strengths and weaknesses. One of MA Ulm's major weaknesses is being slow. I think it should stay like that.
|

March 8th, 2008, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Halt Heretic - Opinions
Quote:
Don_Seba said:
Right in between 'most cumbersome armor' and 'weakest will' contest, they spend some time choosing weapons that best fail to synegize with their armor.
|
The crowd cheers as the armor contest comes to a close with a three-way tie, and the smiths grinning with their shiny lead medals.
Ulmish Mayor speaking to the gathered crowd, "And now it's time for a favorite amongst the lads, the annual 'Weakest Will' competition!"
The crowd cheers.
The mayor continues, "Alright, are the competitors ready? (he pauses) Ready, set, go!"
One contestant immediately belts out, "I give up!"
The mayor replies, "We have a winner!"
The crowd cheers.

|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|