Forseti (Started) - Page 21

Cor2 · #**201** April 21st, 2008, 03:21 PM

Jotunheim had nothing to do with the decision to attack Bandar. We counciled peace in thier regards, unless they became hostile. But now the lines are drawn, and we will abide by them.

We declare war on Bandar.

Cor2 · #**202** April 21st, 2008, 03:24 PM

By the way, this is in regards to Man's lies about Jotunheim not delcaring war. This was many many posts ago before we even had a border with man.

Quote:

Cor2 said:
Ha ha. Way to go Indy!

At first I was neutral in the MAN/TEINCHI war. It was just one sides word against the other, but after reading all the pure vitrol coming from Whollaborg I have to say Indy is at least a more graceful loser. Let this be an open declaration that Jotunheim will attack the kingdom of man on sight. We are now at war.

Whollaborg · #**203** April 22nd, 2008, 10:57 AM

It has been a sad month.

Even if we defended our capitol succesfully, we faced a terrible loss as our mountain fortification in the former Tien Chi lands fell.

As Another of man's castles fell, there is not many left. This time it was a castle man intented and tried to defend. Dozens after dozens were the daughters of Avalon who fell this sad day. The high command of man had failed to bring forth a strom to ground the devastating flying hordes of the Mictlan. Failing in this failed the day.
Thus former lands of Tien Chi have been now completely lost to the bloody hordes. Aid from the Bandar Log is too late. We can see no much hope in their endeavour to help the world. Marakattas in the thrones of Joutunheim, R'lyeh and Agartha are idiotically still supporting the Mictlan which now has grown too strong for even it's numerous slaves to rebel against.

Agartha, the breakers of the oath of non agression pact sadden us for telling tales that they didn't have an alternative. The alternative was a dumb nation of giants that could have been toppled easily. Another and the only honorable alternative would have been disbanding the NAP with us before attacking as the honourable Bandar Log did with the Mictlan (and us, sic!). We hear rumours that Mictlan had learned from Agarthas mishonor and that they have attacked against the Bandar Log before the three months agreed in their non-agression pact had finished.

Zhukov

P.P.S. Jotnheim is itself the lying rogue if they claim that they were not in the peace with us before their sneak attack.

[A tattered parchment that has been archived by the man. It's FROM Jotunheim, a POSITIVE reply to our request to end the first futile war that Jotunheim declared to gain gift of gems or some other more banal gifts from the Tien Chi:]

Re: Forseti: Peace - pacem?

From: Cor2

Thank you for the offer. We are not interested in war right now either. However we will not sign a NAP with you.

May you never sweat
Cor

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We have been in a war for long time and it's so exhausting to keep up fighting against so many a foe.

We are confident that our war against tien chi will be finished soon. Perhaps we two, Jotun and men, could bury the hatchet and smoke some grass to make a peace between our nations?

Zhukov

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

vfb · #**204** April 22nd, 2008, 11:53 AM

We give Man the benefit of the doubt, and assume Man is giddy from the devastating victory they inflicted on Mictlan at their capitol, and in their drunken stupor following their celebrations, they claim that Mictlan violated our NAP with Bandar.

This is completely false. Bandar first reduced our 6-month NAP to a 3-month NAP, and then Bandar cancelled the 3-month NAP. Mictlan had no NAP with Bandar this month, and we fully expected to see Monkeys flying in all directions across our borders. As a defensive measure, Mictlan dispatched several advanced reconnaissance patrols into Bandar territory. Those patrols encountered a couple fierce forwardly-positioned Bandar army groups right on the Mictlan border, so our suspicions appear not to be unwarranted.

Of course, it's possible Man is intentionally spreading lies about Mictlan ... but for now we will ignore the drunken Zhukov, and hope he sobers up by next month.

FAJ · #**205** April 22nd, 2008, 12:19 PM

It is true, Mictlan broke no agreements. We had no intentions of attacking them, but we had broke all our NAPs, sick of sitting doing nothing. I suppose it is better to be annihilated in 2-3 turns than to linger on and wait for a winner to be declared.

Oddly enough, I think I may be playing with an outdated version or something of that nature. The battle reports do not link up to the battle replays.

Cor2 · #**206** April 22nd, 2008, 02:07 PM

FAJ, you have 3.15 yes? I have heard that the battle replay can happen even without a diffrence in version, its just more rare.

FAJ · #**207** April 22nd, 2008, 04:51 PM

I have 3.15, but the some battles I saw in the replay did not match the results. At least one with a very different outcome.

vfb · #**208** April 27th, 2008, 06:45 PM

Mictlan may need to go AI in a few days. I've posted for a sub here but did not get any offers.

IndyPendant · #**209** April 27th, 2008, 08:30 PM

Dayam, this is soooooo tempting to replace vfb. Another crack at that lying bastard. I...just can't do it though. I still have too many games going atm, and I just don't have the time. : (

vfb · #**210** April 27th, 2008, 08:48 PM

Not sure it'd be a great idea to let you take over anyway, Indy. Anyone else who's looking to avenge some sort of personal grievance can likewise please look elsewhere.

I'd prefer a replacement who will have Mictlan's best interests in mind. The AI has that, at least, but its implementation of those goals is somewhat flawed. Unfortunately it will not respect Mictlan's treaties with other nations.