|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 24th, 2008, 02:52 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: in a sleepy daze 
						Posts: 1,678
					 Thanks: 116 
		
			
				Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Awe Vs Trample 
 Does it make sense to give weapons to units that can trample like Golems with Stymphalian wings?  Do they even attack or is better just to give them shields?  Thanks 
				__________________i crossed blades with the mightiest warriors of the golden age.  i witnessed with sorrow the schism that led to the passing of legends. now my sword hangs in its scabbard, with nothing but memories to keep it warm.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 24th, 2008, 02:59 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: La La Land (California, USA) 
						Posts: 1,244
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Awe Vs Trample 
 The weapons will be used if they cannot trample the opponent, i.e. when he's the samesize or bigger.  So the answer to your question greatly depends on what you are facing.
 
 If there is no one big enough to prevent them from trampling, shields and reinvigoration
 items is what you should use.  But in late game, trample is not very good, and I
 actually consider it a disadvantage on a Supercombatant.
 
				__________________No good deed goes unpunished...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 24th, 2008, 03:46 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Eastern Finland 
						Posts: 7,110
					 Thanks: 145 
		
			
				Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Awe Vs Trample 
 Tuidjy said:>> Trample damage is 8 + (2 x Size). Not size difference. But you are correct
 >> that more size difference means the trampler can trample more units.
 
 > Are you sure about that?  I know that this is what the manual says, but I had
 > a horde (40+) of ice elementals try to trample one Jarl, and they barely scratched
 > him although they were trying until the clock ran out.  It's possible that he
 > was getting low damage because he was dodging the tramples, but as I said, there
 > was a horde, and I have trouble believing that his defense was his only salvation.
 
 In my test to see if Cave Drakes could be used to stop elephants, I found out that they can't. They seemed to take just as much trampling damage as normal size 2 humans; had the size difference had an effect, their armor would have protected them from most of the attacks.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 24th, 2008, 03:53 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Winnipeg, Canada 
						Posts: 566
					 Thanks: 8 
		
			
				Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Awe Vs Trample 
 I am quite certain that it is only the size of the trampler that matters. Size 5 creatures do not take any less damage from trampling then size 2.
 
 As an aside, seeing awed units stopped elephants is very amusing.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 24th, 2008, 03:53 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: La La Land (California, USA) 
						Posts: 1,244
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Awe Vs Trample 
 Well, I guess it is size then.  I would love to see it changed, though. 
				__________________No good deed goes unpunished...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |