Re: Wish and Horrors
>> To my knowledge the ten commandments are not the christian definition of good. Jesus abolishes the law and says that you shall love the next. (Not sure of the english wording here). Thus honoring the sabbat is not part of the definition of good in christianity. Not doing what you don't want others to do to you is.
Actually christianity have less clear rules on good and evil than most religions, at least as presented by Jesus. Jesus places higher moral responsibility on the christians then most religious founders do. It is you who shall know what is wrong, and be judged. The old testament might guide you, but it is your thoughts and intentions that are judged. That is a very hard position, especially since very few have the moral fibre of Jesus. Fortunately Christianity allows forgiveness for all those who are unable to cope with this vast responsibility.
The 10 commandments are the best you can get if you want some rules for 'good' by human definition. The bible itself contradicts itself too much and has too much 'radical' stuff in it to be taken as a clear guide so easily. The inquisitors abused and misinterpreted a lot of stuff to kill lots of innocent people. Jesus said a lot of good stuff, but he has also some very 'extreme' speeches in the bible a la "You will burn in hell even if you just think bad of someone". Nobody can fullfill such extreme standards of moral and the also can't be considered as good. However, you are right to say that some common sense is needed to decide what's good an evil. In some conditions you have to fight and kill to save others. It's a very grey area sometimes.
>> Thus both the seraph and the Vastness are not good, by the standard humans should treat each other. Seraphs do kill and maim the unfaithful, quite in opposition of what Jesus said. Vastnesses shatters minds or whatever, probably rather indiscriminately.
Usually, the angles fight for the good, which means they only fight to protect others. Therefore they only fight if they have to and not for pleasure and egoism. However there also a bunch of fallen angles like Satan, Belial, etc. So angles are probably not perfect.
>> It's not anarchism. Its history (the meaning of the term when applied to the study of history), sociology, or otherwise scientific (as in not value laden) perspective. Although the assessment 'history is written by the winner' is perhaps no longer a neutral sentence, but an expression of scienticism (not sure if this word actually exists ).
History WAS anarchism² in most cases. However, in order to live in a social community you have to break the restrictions of anarchism. Therefore, even if human history is quite rough, the normal life was usually guided by the social rules of living peacefull together.
|
Threaded Mode