MP Qwerty - MA team game. Finished

Wokeye · #1 May 6th, 2008, 07:12 AM

I will play! Don't have a team-mate yet.

FAJ · #2 May 6th, 2008, 03:43 PM

I wouldn't mind playing in this, but I don't have a teamate lined up. If anyone doesn't mind a weak partener, I would be happy to jump into this.

Ironhawk · #3 May 6th, 2008, 05:16 PM

I'm interested. Wokeye, you want to team up? We made a pretty good pair in Epotara.

Also, I would like to have CBM in this game. It really goes out of its way to make the heaps of useless units and spells actually somewhat useful.

Dedas · #4 May 6th, 2008, 05:18 PM

I'm definitely against CBM in this game. I want plain vanilla.

ano · #5 May 6th, 2008, 05:29 PM

Ironhawk, I would greatly appreciate if you joined but I also definitely don't want CBM. Once again, I have nothing against it but I like vanilla game as it is.

quantum_mechani · #6 May 6th, 2008, 06:30 PM

I see the Just Say No To CB campaign has met great success. Remember, don't cave to peer pressure, just say 'sorry man, I don't do that stuff'.

ano · #7 May 6th, 2008, 06:42 PM

No) The society is just very conservative - it is a usual thing. A rare man will start seeking risky adventures in other countries if he has got a comfortable armchair and a cup of tea.

ano · #8 June 16th, 2008, 09:16 PM

Oooooh! I really love someone breaking peace treaties without any declaration!
Let it be so...

Kheldron · #9 June 17th, 2008, 04:50 AM

I'd like to clarify some point before looking like a noob.

Can you have a NAP without ever actually writing words like treaty, NAP etc...or formally saying you won't attack him for X turns or indefinitely ?

For example, if you agreed on someone's claims over indy provinces during expansion (like 10-15 turns ago), do you have a binding NAP forbidding you to ever attack that nation without due warning ?

I would have thought no but then I'm fairly new to MP around here (only played in irl friends circle before the last 2 months)

So please tell me before I ever write anything to anyone that would be thought as a peace treaty because I didn't care to insult him to remind him we were neutrals at best...

ano · #10 June 17th, 2008, 05:16 AM

No problem. For me personally "peace treaty" means that the opposing side should be notified at least just before attack. Otherwise I can see absolutely no sense in it. Do you?) Everything is like in real life

Was a word "treaty" written? I don't remember but the word "peace" definitely was.
Once again, no problem. I just made some mistakes I shouldn't have made)