|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 1st, 2008, 01:55 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Columbus, OH 
						Posts: 2,204
					 Thanks: 67 
		
			
				Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: SingleAge mod 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Twan said: I think fetishes will be the main magical economy items with these settings. For 30 gems you can make 2, when a clam cost 35 (then alchemize or trade the production for pearls if you want).
 
 It may be a bad point for balance as the few nature/fire nations (or lucky players finding enchantress) are the only able of large fetish hoarding (taking a n/f pretender isn't sufficient as there is no fire/nature summon like the naiad allowing to go from one fetish a turn to many).
 
 Then the good point is : it's harder for Rlyeh and other wish capable nations to make them.
   
 |  Fetishes are considerably worse than clams. They're terrible amounts of micro, they cost you upkeep because you have to put them on disposable commanders, and fire gems are probably some of the worst in the game, unlike astral which can be used to wish, or to be alchemized.
 
Jazzepi |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 1st, 2008, 04:36 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2006 
						Posts: 2,198
					 Thanks: 90 
		
			
				Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: SingleAge mod 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Xietor said: Thoughts on the 4w 2n clam? 
 |  Probably, a bit too much of a nerf.  3w 2n is probably enough.  
 
Even if it does benefit Baalz and Ma Oceania!   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 1st, 2008, 04:39 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Oxford, UK 
						Posts: 5,921
					 Thanks: 194 
		
			
				Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: SingleAge mod 
 I think the 4w 2n clam is good. If you lower the cost much the game is in danger of degenerating into a clam hoarding rush. After all, 18 w is only about 50% more than the standard 11 w. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 1st, 2008, 05:28 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: France 
						Posts: 961
					 Thanks: 2 
		
			
				Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: SingleAge mod 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Jazzepi said: Fetishes are considerably worse than clams. They're terrible amounts of micro, they cost you upkeep because you have to put them on disposable commanders, and fire gems are probably some of the worst in the game, unlike astral which can be used to wish, or to be alchemized.
 
 
 |  Having to make one commander every 9 or so turns and pay him to produce about 7 or 8 fire gems isn't that expensive.
 
Anyway I agree fetish price is fine as it is, because they have some problems clam don't have (the main isn't having to recruit commanders, but having to wait 1 to 3 turns before a fetish produce gem each time you change the owner - as they only work well on commanders with several afflictions- it may balance the cost difference, as long the fetish hoarder don't have access to commanders with more than 10 hp).
 
The only thing I was saying is : if the few nations able to fetish hoard base their strategy on them (with players supporting the microgestion) they may have a consequent advantage as, even if you want to finally produce other gems, making 7 fetish is better than the 3 clams you'd have for the same price - and especially as, with our number of players, finding trade partners interested by fire gems and paying more gems than alchemy for them shouldn't be extremely hard).
			
			
			
			
				  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 1st, 2008, 09:36 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, Texas 
						Posts: 2,435
					 Thanks: 57 
		
			
				Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: SingleAge mod 
 After making a fetish farm once I will *never* do that again because of the micro involved.  I got so fed up with trying to figure out each turn who was close to death that I ended up forging rings of regen for each of my fetish holders...:/ 
				__________________My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 1st, 2008, 09:59 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: May 2007 
						Posts: 1,462
					 Thanks: 34 
		
			
				Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: SingleAge mod 
 I had something like a 100 fetish economy in a recent game as Lanka and it was pretty good, believe me   . Yes, it requires micro but why are you afraid of it. Outcome of a fetish is even bettee than outcome of a clam not only because of alchemizing fire gems to pearls but also because there're several very good endgame fire spells (Flames form the sky being the most obvious) that can really ruin the day of any attacker. 
Also one of the biggest fetish-hoarding nations is Machaka who has even less problems with them as Black Sorcerers never die of disease and don't gather many other afflictions when diseased. Also nations with healing like MA T'ien Ch'i may equip cheap researchers with fetishes and set some Apothecaries to constantly heal. Your mages will almost never get feeblemind (mute does nothing for mages with one pick) and if you remove a fetish when mage has 2-3 hp he will most probably stay alive and may be equipped again. So you really don't have to even recruit additional commanders and pay extra upkeep - just use what you have! 
I don't even mention nations who have commanders with native recuperation. These have almost no problems at all - just watch them and remove fetish in time. 
Yes, it is micro. But it is extremely cheap gem factory as well. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 1st, 2008, 12:29 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: New Orleans 
						Posts: 2,741
					 Thanks: 21 
		
			
				Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: SingleAge mod 
  LLAmabest has finished the Kingmaker Mod. He redid the banners so all the nations look different and spent much work on it. So those who play in the game owe him a debt of thanks.
 There are others as well, who contributed mightily, such as Slobby, with the race descriptions, Dr. P, with the research mod, and of course the original authors of the single age mod, gandalf, and the banners and streamers mod, etc.
 
 Llamabeast also reports 52/61 players have sent in pretenders. There is about 12 hours left. And there will be no extensions. Hopefully the rest will get their selections in on time. I still have 2 subs waiting in the wings, who will get 24 hours to get in their pretenders after the deadline passes, then the game will proceed with the number we have.
 
 At a minimum, that will be 54. Though I will pm 3 more subs as well.
 
				__________________"War is an art and as such is not susceptible of explanation by fixed formula."
 - General George Patton Jr.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 1st, 2008, 12:32 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2005 
						Posts: 1,122
					 Thanks: 5 
		
			
				Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: SingleAge mod 
 I received a pretender file from you, but unfortunately someone else has beaten you to it, and Mictlan has already been taken. Please try again with another nation. This is a list of the nations taken so far (note you can always check this at www.llamaserver.net ):
 
Can someone kick out the old LA Mictlan pretender? |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 1st, 2008, 12:34 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: New Orleans 
						Posts: 2,741
					 Thanks: 21 
		
			
				Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: SingleAge mod 
  are you sure that was not evilhomer? I will ask llamabeast to check. 
				__________________"War is an art and as such is not susceptible of explanation by fixed formula."
 - General George Patton Jr.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				June 1st, 2008, 12:35 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Poland 
						Posts: 3,414
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: SingleAge mod 
 9 still missing? And probably one of them is you? But still a lot... but probably some people were waiting for the patch as there was some doubt if we won't have to submit new pretender files after that. But still, it is few days already. |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |