Andean Zorro - MA/diff_research/VPs - game started - Page 2

Janlm · #1 June 18th, 2008, 08:45 AM

is there room for more?

Omnirizon · #2 June 18th, 2008, 10:34 AM

Janim,

there is room for a couple more. pick a nation and post on any preferences for settings; specifically map, graphs, CBM, and victory (cumulative or percentage VPs).

I'll give it till the end of the day to see if anybody else joins up. we'll take at most one more, then close; and if nobody else shows up by tonight, we'll roll with this nine.

start getting pretenders ready, this train is going to be moving soon.

Omnirizon · #3 June 18th, 2008, 10:56 AM

Here's how votes are looking:

Map is Cradle

Graphs are still a toss up (with four yay and nay). BigDisAwesome and Janim haven't voted on this yet though.

CBM is overwhelmingly no

Victory is looking like half of capitals (with four caps, three cumulative). Kheldron, Dragar, and Janim have not cast votes on this.

among those voting, there's a little more support for Indies 7 than lower numbers.

a couple of ppl have expressed HoF = 10 for < 10 players. Unless anybody objects, I will go with this.

also, please note sites are set at 50; quite a bit higher than default for MA. I'm guessing this is fine with everybody, as no one has said a word about it, but I wanted to bring it to everyone's attention.

DonCorazon · #4 June 18th, 2008, 11:10 AM

Omni, I love the VP and tougher research idea so would like to join if there is still space. If so, I'd like to try Pythium. My vote would be for CBM (though sounds like I'll lose that one). No strong opinion as to the other options.

Dragar · #5 June 18th, 2008, 11:34 AM

I vote for half capitals and indies 7, looking forward to this game

Janlm · #6 June 18th, 2008, 11:05 AM

i'll pick marignon

anticipatient · #7 July 19th, 2008, 02:01 AM

Game is postponed 48 hours, so it shouldn't host until something like Monday. Just keep sending your turns in when you get a chance, and ask for extensions as you need them, bigdis. I am happy to keep setting extensions if it means we can keep the game going

anticipatient · #8 July 20th, 2008, 04:00 PM

I am guessing Llama confused Andean Zorro and Darwin's Zorro; Darwin's Zorro, Llama said, was started, but actually it is just not on the list anymore, and based on my email and whatnot, the times all match. So we'll see. I think we're overworking llamabeast

Dragar · #9 July 22nd, 2008, 04:19 AM

My understanding was that there is no 'rule' per se that governs treaties/pacts etc, its up to the player to trust the other party. Of course, any broken NAP should be made public so that the offender's reputation is tarnished, but I've always found the capacity to backstab is what makes diplomacy in multiplayer games potentially so exciting. I'm always too proud of my reputation to do it, but it always adds spice to a game when it happens

Kheldron · #10 July 22nd, 2008, 04:52 AM

Ok then.
To add spice, I'd like you all to know Pangea was the one asking for the treaty while Ashdod was biting at his hoofs a few turns ago.

Since he sent his god and about 500 troops to me, all those of you that have an interest in his whereabouts or want to uphold any honor in this game shall feel free to go and plunder his lands, he won't have much to defend.

Enjoy!