|
|
|
 |

July 19th, 2008, 08:06 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 341
Thanks: 3
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
To add an extra evaluations:
MA Shinuyama: 2-5-4-2-2. (weak army for early expansion, lack of sacreds and low morale make them attractive nation to be rushed. Later, they have access to very strong army buffs and one of the best, if not the best, and more cost effective mages in the game which happen to be non-capital. Late game they have strong Death which means strong thugs and Tartarian factory, and easy access to game-winning BE like Army of Gold+Heat from hell)
|

July 26th, 2008, 05:13 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 177
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
Bump?
|

July 27th, 2008, 05:16 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
This thread kind of bobs up and down a bit.  I really should edit those first posts to reflect my easing of the restrictions for posting ratings.  I guess I just overestimated the number of oldtimers who would find this interesting enough to take the time.  Hmmmm, maybe this will finally get me to drag myself into IRC and bug some people there. 
|

July 28th, 2008, 12:58 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,133
Thanks: 25
Thanked 59 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
I think it's just too hard to really quantify the nations.
there are some obviously powerful nations.
but I can think of ways to counter certain of them with what are considered very weak nations in the same age.
I would almost say that
powerful = obvious and easy to use powerful strategy
that said, some nations are overpowered, but by and large, most of them have options available which makes them all scary in the hands of a crafty player.
|

July 28th, 2008, 03:50 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)
Well this is absolutely true. But to the more experienced player, "power" is relative to the amount of options, so if one tactic fails or just isn't applicable to a particular foe, you have something to fall back on.
This is why nations such as Ulm and Abysia should tend to rate consistently low, as they are more 1 dimensional than other nations, and are more easily defeated. But by the same token, since Early Game has much to do with expansion against indies, they'd do well there, since they have cheap and heavily armored troops, but then their relative "power" begins to drop off somewhat compared to other races who can more easily change gears to counter an unexpected threat.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|