|
|
|
|
 |
July 23rd, 2008, 01:00 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 527
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ulm - Ashdod.
NO! Now all Pythium's neighbors get a bunch of free provinces.
You seem to be in a decent spot on the score graphs. Is there anyway we could try to find a sub? It's never fun when 1-2 nations get a huge advantage because someone went AI.
|
July 23rd, 2008, 01:08 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Ulm - Ashdod.
Yes, it might be a good idea to try to find a sub but I'm not sure we'll manage to.
|
July 23rd, 2008, 01:37 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Ulm - Ashdod.
I don't know that there is a huge advantage to be had BigDis.
Ulm and Ryalla are very dominant in this game.
|
July 23rd, 2008, 05:11 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Ulm - Ashdod.
Quote:
BigDisAwesome said:
NO! Now all Pythium's neighbors get a bunch of free provinces.
You seem to be in a decent spot on the score graphs. Is there anyway we could try to find a sub? It's never fun when 1-2 nations get a huge advantage because someone went AI.
|
Pretty sure he's already AI - he made the same post on BraveNewWorld, and it hosted immediately, and he shows as AI now. |
July 23rd, 2008, 08:10 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 527
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ulm - Ashdod.
If we were to delay though and someone resend this turns .2h file in without the command to go AI, then I'm pretty sure he wouldn't be.
|
July 23rd, 2008, 08:11 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 411
Thanks: 69
Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Ulm - Ashdod.
I would be fine with a minor delay & a non-AI Pythium.
|
July 23rd, 2008, 08:24 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Ulm - Ashdod.
What do you mean by "minor" delay? I don't really think it's very easy to find a sub for him, however I don't mind it too.
|
July 23rd, 2008, 10:38 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Ulm - Ashdod.
Look,
No offense, but I had an neutrality pact with john that hemmed me in restricting the territories I could take. The return for that was an ally.
Its 27 turns into the game. I don't want another player I don't know, and who doesn't know the agreements taking over.
Let Pythium fall to its neighbors - anyone that is concerned about Ashdod gaining a third of pythium should check the charts. Ryllah and Ulm are way ahead of that already.
|
July 24th, 2008, 01:11 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 411
Thanks: 69
Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Ulm - Ashdod.
Fine, Pythium can go AI. But you owe me one, Ashdod.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode