Global War (upgraded to 3.20)

[IndyPendant]

Well, Baalz has swayed me with his argument. I do agree with Rathar that one player controlling multiple nations does give Good 'unfair' advantages it would normally not have...but if it's a choice between that and Good collapsing completely, I do prefer the game to continue. We really need to find a replacement asap though.

As to delaying the game: Please. No delays. No more. I can't take it. I'll agree to anything if it avoids any more damned delays! (Only slightly joking. ; ) If we absolutely must, we can delay. But if there's any other option (such as CUnkown continuing to play the nation until a replacement is found), then it has my vote.

[Rathar]

Sounds reasonable.

[CUnknown]

Okay, so we are going to continue with the game, and look for a replacement for Pythium? But, Arco will be set AI and all his stuff sent to Good. If no replacement is found, I will take Pythium's turn again. Everyone agrees?

[LoloMo]

Hi, I've agreed to sub for LA Arco. Give me a couple of days to look things over and read over some of the posts. This seems like an interesting game.

[Rathar]

I am still adamantly against one human playing two nations. No matter what.

Don't get me wrong. I understand the situation and I "think" I am accounting for my bias in it but it's still uncool. Not quite cricket, what what!

[Zeldor]

Well, if Arco is not going AI I can probably take them back on 5th. Assuming there is not bad attitude in good team and no one screwed what I repaired there

[Baalz]

THE BURNINATOR WILL BE SCREWING EACH AND EVERY PART OF ARCOSCEPHALE, ASHES IS ALL THAT WILL REMAIN SHORTLY SO NO NEED TO WORRY.