Question about diplomacy - .com.unity Forums

The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

		.com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 3: The Awakening
Question about diplomacy

View Poll Results: Would you break a long-term NAP before its too late to stop a clear winner?
Yep, watching the game go by is silly.	38	61.29%
Nope, I'll keep my word till the bitter end.	23	37.10%
I'd flip a coin	1	1.61%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools

Display Modes

#11

September 5th, 2008, 10:28 AM

thejeff

General

Join Date: Apr 2005

Posts: 3,327

Thanks: 4

Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts

Re: Question about diplomacy

Of course, but whats the point of the deal? Sure I can talk to someone and suggest it'd be better for both of us to expand against indies than fight each other, or join together to attack a 3rd party, but if it's fine to break a deal at any time, why actually put terms on it?
More specifically, what's the point in the usual NAP with 3 turns of warning? If there are not even any diplomatic consequences, since that's the point of this game variant, why would I ever give 3 turns of warning instead of a surprise attack?

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Forum Rules

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM.