Well as I mentioned somewhere in this thread the players in the game that prompted my original post agree there was NO evil plot intended (just perhaps a poor desision and a host up too early in the morning :-) ) I'm now just curious what people think of the rule that allows a player to surrender to an ally. Personally I don't like it. I'm thinking perhaps a better way to deal with surrender would be simply remove the surrender button and make it such that a player could only surrender by accepting the demand of another player.
Edited to read 'NO evil plot' Oops. didn't make sense before.
Quote:
Originally posted by mac5732:
Have you asked or explained your concern to the other player? If so and he says tough, then after I bashed his stars, I'd walk...
just some ideas mac
|
[ May 21, 2002, 01:13: Message edited by: DavidG ]
Re: Opinions on ethics of this PBW move
Threaded Mode