|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 7th, 2008, 11:11 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Scotland 
						Posts: 2,066
					 Thanks: 109 
		
			
				Thanked 162 Times in 118 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed] 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Micah  Yeah, 12/26 certainly changes the focus from dominating the map to trying to grab enough VPs to win. |  
I don't think I agree.  Even if you're grabbing VPs, the ability to take a minimum of 8 enemy capitals is a pretty good sign that you're dominating the map already. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 8th, 2008, 04:33 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Poland 
						Posts: 3,414
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed] 
 Ok, here is .map file with all neighbours and terrains. Please take a look at it to make sure there are no mistakes    I will fix .tga a bit to mark towns and some blocked connections around central caps. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 9th, 2008, 07:52 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Douglasville, Ga 
						Posts: 604
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed] 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Gregstrom  
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Micah  Yeah, 12/26 certainly changes the focus from dominating the map to trying to grab enough VPs to win. |  
I don't think I agree.  Even if you're grabbing VPs, the ability to take a minimum of 8 enemy capitals is a pretty good sign that you're dominating the map already. |  Yeah but you could technically have two people controlling 8 enemy capitals. Or in fact it is even possible for two people to gain control of 12 VP's on the same exact turn even. What then??    Its probably not a big deal because the chances of it happening that way are not terribly likely but it is a possibility, and it would be pretty screwed up if it happened. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 9th, 2008, 07:58 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Oxford, UK 
						Posts: 5,921
					 Thanks: 194 
		
			
				Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed] 
 Too unlikely to bother worrying about I reckon. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 9th, 2008, 08:18 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Douglasville, Ga 
						Posts: 604
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed] 
 By the way, we were supposed to PM our Team nation choices to Zeldor right? instead of posting them in the thread..    I sent our teams picks to Zeldor a day or two ago I think but have not heard anything yet. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 9th, 2008, 08:31 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Poland 
						Posts: 3,414
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed] 
 I am waiting for other teams, still 6 teams need to submit their picks. I got yours   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 9th, 2008, 10:20 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Douglasville, Ga 
						Posts: 604
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed] 
 Oh, I may have noticed a problem with the map. I'm not sure.  
 It looks like province 400 is supposed to connect to 408 but instead it connects to 404
 
 I'm just going by how the colored tunnels look but I would think that that is how you wanted it to be.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 9th, 2008, 10:25 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: May 2004 
						Posts: 4,075
					 Thanks: 203 
		
			
				Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed] 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Zeldor  I am waiting for other teams, still 6 teams need to submit their picks. I got yours   |  did you get ours zel? 
our perhaps you can say who you're waiting on ...
                 Last edited by chrispedersen; November 9th, 2008 at 10:38 PM..
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 10th, 2008, 03:37 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Poland 
						Posts: 3,414
					 Thanks: 26 
		
			
				Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed] 
 PsiSoldier:
 Hah, thanks! Indeed, 400 should link to 408 instead of 404.
 
 I have team picks from:
 Micah + QM
 Coobe + Ferrosol
 PsiSoldier + Executor
 Atul + Evilhomer
 DrP + Gregstrom
 JimMorrison + MadFrancis
 WingedDog + Pretorian
 
 With 7 nations making their picks there are no conflicts over their 1st choices so far.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 10th, 2008, 06:55 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH 
						Posts: 2,474
					 Thanks: 51 
		
			
				Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed] 
 Hold up, hold up, did I miss something?  I thought we weren't allowed to have superteams?  Micah+QM?  Oh ye gods.  I know that QM doesn't have the best MP record, but that's just because his *diplomacy* is poor, which is a very thin candy shell around the pure hurting of which he is made.  As for Micah - I believe that the no-teams-of-two-veterans rule has him in mind specifically, no?
 *Both* of those players are better than I am, and I think I must be in the upper 50%.
 
 Obviously, it's too late to shuffle teams: in compensation, put them in the middle or give them 4 points or set them on fire or something.
 
 Of course, when they win anyway, it'll be gruesome humiliation for all concerned.
 
				__________________If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |