|
|
|
 |
|

January 14th, 2009, 06:18 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Searching for Blood Sites is superfluous !!
I happen to agree with Sombre, not because I mind site-searching but because horror marks are incredibly weak (which is why the B9 bless is awful). If your mages at some fort have a 5% chance each turn of getting +1% chance per turn of a horror attack (likely to result in a horror attack in about 70 turns), you may lose a couple of mages over the next 40 turns (gcost: 500 or so), which isn't enough to bother relocating a fort for. I made those 5%/1% numbers up but IME they're ballpark-accurate; horror marks are more frightening than deadly unless they're STRONG or you like to cast Call Horror in battle. Of course if you lose a PRETENDER (as opposed to research mages) to Horror Marks that's a different level of pain.
-Max
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|

January 14th, 2009, 07:18 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Searching for Blood Sites is superfluous !!
< is quoting broken? I couldnt get it to work right... >
I'm with Sombre on this one too. I remember reading that line about OCD and Horror Marks and laughing and agreeing completely. A minor horror mark on a single unit is practically beneath notice. To worry about it would be like tracking each affliction that a soldier picked up in detail.
|

January 14th, 2009, 07:50 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Searching for Blood Sites is superfluous !!
You don't track your soldier's afflictions in detail?!
You must separate the cripples out into their own squads, to prevent your lines from being messed up. That's two squads, one for cripples, one for limpers. Mutes, Chest Wound, Weakened and NHWs can be ignored and mixed in with the rest of your troops. Lost an Arm is usually okay unless it's the very first unit in an archer squad. Diseased goes straight to the front lines, as do Blind archers. If your overall morale is weak, then Battle Fright units need to be weeded out, especially for tramplers.
Who thinks it's wrong 'cos I'm splittin' and co-hittin' at. Well if you do, that's OCD and you're not down with it.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|

January 14th, 2009, 08:06 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Searching for Blood Sites is superfluous !!
Quote:
Originally Posted by VedalkenBear
Sombre, while your own feelings on the matter of site-searching is made quite manifest in your thread, comments like 'only OCD people' care about certain things do not promote discussion. I certainly care about finding such sites, and I don't have OCD. In fact, most people would be insulted by the comparison.
Do I play multiplayer? No, but I don't think that's grounds for automatic dismissal of my comments.
|
What are you on about? I haven't made a thread about site searching so I don't know what you're referring to there. In this thread I didn't connect OCD and site searching at all. I said only OCD people would care about the odd random weak horror mark so much they'd make out the offchance of accidentally building a fort in a province which had a horror marking site in it to be a huge deal.
And what does whether you play MP or not have to do with anything?
Are you another one of Gandalf's secret accounts? You make about as much sense.
|

January 14th, 2009, 08:10 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Searching for Blood Sites is superfluous !!
Well, Gandalf DID thank him.....! Dun dun DUN!!!
You down with OCD? Yeah you know me!
<3
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JimMorrison For This Useful Post:
|
|

January 14th, 2009, 08:11 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Searching for Blood Sites is superfluous !!
-crip walk-
O to the C to the D to the awg!
|

January 15th, 2009, 11:49 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florence, Italy
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 740
Thanked 112 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
Re: Searching for Blood Sites is superfluous !!
On the topic of Horror Marks... do the power of the Horror Mark spell depend on the S level of the caster? Can't find this anywhere. I've tested an Horror Marking communion and after some horror mark spells by a caster brought to S5/6 the enemy pretender was assassinated by the HoH the next turn, still I don't know if there's a correlation.
|

January 15th, 2009, 01:42 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Searching for Blood Sites is superfluous !!
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfb
You don't track your soldier's afflictions in detail?!
You must separate the cripples out into their own squads, to prevent your lines from being messed up. That's two squads, one for cripples, one for limpers. Mutes, Chest Wound, Weakened and NHWs can be ignored and mixed in with the rest of your troops. Lost an Arm is usually okay unless it's the very first unit in an archer squad. Diseased goes straight to the front lines, as do Blind archers. If your overall morale is weak, then Battle Fright units need to be weeded out, especially for tramplers.
Who thinks it's wrong 'cos I'm splittin' and co-hittin' at. Well if you do, that's OCD and you're not down with it.
|
Hahah, nice vfb. That is some serious OCD action  But yeah I dont pay any attention to soldiers wounds. When I need archer-decoys I do select from the injured first, but other than that I dont pay any attention to the rank and file.
|

January 15th, 2009, 02:20 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: Searching for Blood Sites is superfluous !!
Really? Doesnt limping affect the speed they reach the enemy? Doesnt losing an arm or eyes affect archers and make them charge instead of fire? Not too mention too many with morale afflictions. Not checking my injuries once in awhile would seem to affect my formations effectiveness. MicroManagement maybe but as far as OCD?
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|

January 15th, 2009, 02:35 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Searching for Blood Sites is superfluous !!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf Parker
Really? Doesnt limping affect the speed they reach the enemy?
|
On chaff, who cares? If there are too many of them behaving that way you can always just remove them. That's not the same thing as obsessively checking afflictions.
Quote:
Doesnt losing an arm or eyes affect archers and make them charge instead of fire?
|
Very, very, very rarely. It seems it has to be the very first archer in the unit. I've never seen it happen.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|