MP: Yang: Newbie game EA CoD defaults - Running

[qio]

Originally Posted by licker

My my...

A tad touchy about this?

Your talking more garbage.

Originally Posted by licker

My advice is crystal clear. This game is about more than just determining what you are good with, or what your favorite strategy is. If the game is to be played with certain settings, then you should be able to adapt to those settings.

Go back to school. That's my advice. You did not ask for it. I did not ask for yours. Understand? It is irrelevant to the issue at hand. The issue is "should we increase the frequency for magic sites".

Originally Posted by licker

Others have said they feel more sites makes it more fun. You have said more sites disadvantages your strategy.

Yes. If it comes down to a majority decision, I have pointed out why increasing magic site frequency is a bad thing. Some will agree with me, some will not. A few like you will probably not understand.

I want to make this VERY clear, as your reading ability is clearly compromised. I have NOT SAID that this DISADVANTAGES my strategy. Please quote exactly where you think I say this. Why are you assuming I am playing a certain strategy? I am pointing out that by making modification X, you are directly harming certain builds. I am playing Vanheim. Increased magic site frequency is advantageous for me.

Originally Posted by licker

Though it should be noted, that your strategy is only disadvantaged in a relative sense, and perhaps not at all, as you seem to think that a rainbow pretender will find 'fewer' sites than the level 0 sites you appear to feel disadvantaged by, or the 'extra' sites a nation lacking diversity will miss.

You also clearly misunderstand what I said. A rainbow pretender will NOT find LESS sites. However, ANY player that takes over provinces has a HIGHER chance of finding lvl0 sites. This is VERY advantageous for nation/pretender builds that have poor site search capabilities (for example Vanheim - my nation).

Originally Posted by licker

I'm not sure how you gathered from my post that I was neutral on this issue anyway, but no matter, until the host asks for some kind of tally I don't see that it will matter much.

I don't know why I made that assumption. Maybe, because you DID not say you were in FAVOR or AGAINST having the magic site frequency increased - you know, the ISSUE. I am against this, you got that much.

[pyg]

qio, I think you are stepping a little over the line. It's just a game. I see a lot of miscommunication going on here and I don't think this is going anywhere positive. Let's all just chill.