Re: Players Profile List
Perhaps a better implementation would be to ask each reviewer a set of yes/no questions about the player they are reviewing:
Did this player acquire provinces faster than you?
Did this player research at a faster pace than you?
Did this player's army grow faster than yours?
Did this player propose any diplomatic agreements with you?
Did this player accept any diplomatic agreements you proposed?
Did this player honor all agreements made with you?
Were battles against this player generally weighted in his favor (force-wise)?
Were battles against this player generally weighted in your favor (force-wise)?
When battling this player with evenly matched forces did he consistently win?
When battling this player with evenly matched forces did he consistently loose?
It would still be subjective, but it's acknowledged as such. ***-u-me-ing the aformentioned politeness and honesty attributed to Dom3 players, more reviews for more players would allow (potentially) meaningful values to be assigned to some of the 'characteristics' in the original post.
|