All the info is welcome and the way it is set down is good and makes for easy reading and correcting. I've copied it to my to-do list but things like this..
229 – Su-24M
Rename to Su-24M2
Years - 2007
"Years - 2007" does not tell me if this is an in service or OOS date. If I had to guess I'd guess it's an in service date.
ALSO
537 – Su-24
Rename to Su-24M (for Kh-29 missiles which were used on this version)
Year 1981 (760 regiment of Lipetskiy TsBP)
EW=8 (irradiation alerting system “Bereza” SPO-15M, IRST sensor L082 “Mak-UL”, jamming station APP-50, self defense equipment controlled by separate digital computer “Neon”)
FC=20 (laser-tv aiming system “Caira-23”)
Vision=30
Size=5
538 – Su-24
Rename to Su-24M (for Kh-29 missiles)
Year 1981 (760 regiment of Lipetskiy TsBP)
EW=8 (irradiation alerting system “Bereza” SPO-15M, IRST sensor L082 “Mak-UL”, jamming station APP-50, self defense equipment controlled by separate digital computer “Neon”)
FC=20 (laser-tv aiming system “Caira-23”)
Vision=30
Size=5
Both those units are level bombers. Level bombers do
NOT get FC
Quote:
MOBHACK HELP
LEVEL BOMBERS: They do not need to locate a target on the ground to attack, so need no vision. They do not aim at anything, so FC and RF is superfluous.
|
I have noticed that in some OOB's vision/RF/FC has snuck into some bomber units and that's now on the to-do list to clean them out as it does affect unit cost and leads to misunderstandings. The Level Bomber code does not use the vision/RF/FC ratings
Now......... perhaps whoever wrote this wanted these changed to fighter-bomber. If so that needs to made clear AND why those particular bombers should be changed
Don
Re: Russian aircrafts v4
Threaded Mode