MP: CarCrash - EA Game - CBM - (Running)

[Jazzepi]

My mistake. After reviewing my PMs, Yomi and Sauro don't have any standing NAPs.

Jazzepi

[Calahan]

Originally Posted by Jazzepi

To the rest of you, a warning :

Calahan is a liar and a thief. He's broken his NAP with us by moving 3+ stealth armies through our provinces to purposefully activate our PD. While at first I thought it was just a fluke, he still has armies nested in our territories. I would not be surprised if he is in cahoots with Caelum.

Jazzepi

Excuse me Jazzepi, but what NAP are you talking about? I have only signed one NAP in the whole game, and it was not with your nation of Sauromatia.

I know we are currently having a difference of opinion on another thread, on a completely seperate issue, so I would kindly ask that any personal feelings you have towards me do not spill over onto this thread as a result.

Edit: May I also remind everyone of the rules regarding NAP's for this game as written on the game status page.

Originally Posted by Calahan

Situation Regarding NAP's etc (Non-Aggression Pacts)
No NAP agreements in this game will be considered as inviolable in any way. You are free to sign as many NAP's as you wish, but you do so at your own risk. Also, I personally think that in a game like Dominions 3 there isn't really any such thing as an NAP, since in theory everyone is aiming to win, and there can be only one winner. So all NAP's should instead be considered as Mutual Benefit Agreements, whereby both nations benefit for whatever reason(s) from not engaging in hostilities against the other nation. But the moment one side is no longer benefiting from such an agreement, then that is the moment they are most likely to break them. So if you are ever surprised by a nation breaking an agreement, then maybe you were mistaken with regards to just how important that agreement was to them, or how much they could gain from suddenly attacking you.

Also, if any NAP (or like agreement) is broken in any way, be it intentional, accidental, or whatever, then you have no right what-so-ever to complain about it in the game thread. Please keep this in mind. Any disputes regarding these matters should be dealt with via PM's.

It clears says here that if any NAP's are broken, you have "no right what-so-ever" to complain about it in the game thread. Please can I ask everyone to bare this in mind for the rest of the game.

[Calahan]

Originally Posted by Silence0

Sorry for the incovenience..I´ve had to travel without warning and couldn´t make it in time..Many thanks calahan for the delay..and for doing it for sake of a fun and balanced game..

Glad that at least someone benefited from my pro-active actions

Originally Posted by Silence0

....but even though i was the offender i sort of agree with zapmeister..most of the time it's possible and better to ask for a delay..and i deserved it

Originally Posted by Zapmeister

If someone is going to miss the deadline, all they have to do is ask for an extension, which takes 2 seconds assuming they have connectivity. If they can't be bothered doing that, then a stale is appropriate, IMHO.

Must admit I never really thought of viewing a stale as a 'punishment' for not asking for a delay. Interest concept though Although there is always the question mark over whether a player didn't ask for a delay because they couldn't (no net connection, unexpected travel, many other obvious things). But like I said, I won't take any pro-active stale actions again unless others think it is a good idea. (currently see 2-0 against)

From an in-game perspective, I tend to view stales as just an extremely bad random event. "Your entire nation is on strike for the month" Could be worse I guess.

Originally Posted by Jazzepi

My mistake. After reviewing my PMs, Yomi and Sauro don't have any standing NAPs.

Jazzepi

No worries