.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

The Falklands War: 1982- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 3: The Awakening

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 18th, 2009, 07:49 PM
Fantomen's Avatar

Fantomen Fantomen is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Me a viking
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 81
Thanked 122 Times in 73 Posts
Fantomen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The Movement Bug: An Arguement Against MP?

It has been suggested somewhere that having a stealthy unit (like a scout) in the target province may trigger this bug sometimes. I have encountered it both with and without having a scout there so I dunno.

So far been spared from this bug causing any major problems but it sure is annoying.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 18th, 2009, 09:24 PM

Raiel Raiel is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 149
Thanks: 49
Thanked 15 Times in 5 Posts
Raiel is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The Movement Bug: An Arguement Against MP?

Frozen Lama & Fantomen: I also read that report. Sorry, no scout of mine in the target province. Though I'm pretty sure at least one other player has an astral window on the target province - that's entirely irrelevant as far I've experienced and read.

chrispedersen: Thanks - I guess I should feel at least somewhat fortunate.

Bananadine: It's real. I'm not planning on doing anything as rash as disappearing, but I thought about it. Maybe you can send me that pendant... one can never have too much luck, no?

Quitti: You're right, but I've a bit of the competitive perfectionest in me. I take myself too seriously.

NTJedi: Again, thanks... I guess my experience is not worse than the average. And of course you aren't driven into a rage - you're a Jedi. But I hate bugs with a passion. Unless they're the kind that show me exactly where my own code is wrong.

archaeolept: I didn't back up the 2.h file. However, that battle was the last one planned and ordered... I did end the turn and then go back in to verify the orders stuck... then Quit Without Saving.

The other thing I can add is that I had my armies split into two different groups for ease of scripting. Both groups are still selectable this turn and both had move orders... even if I had clicked in such a way to cancel one groups orders, the other group would have moved in.

Finally, my intended victim has confirmed that he did attempt to attack my province from the target province and he was confused about why his armies didn't attack.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 19th, 2009, 01:04 AM

chrispedersen chrispedersen is offline
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
chrispedersen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The Movement Bug: An Arguement Against MP?

the spies bit could well be true - it seems to fit.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 19th, 2009, 03:41 PM
Fantomen's Avatar

Fantomen Fantomen is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Me a viking
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 81
Thanked 122 Times in 73 Posts
Fantomen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The Movement Bug: An Arguement Against MP?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiel View Post
Finally, my intended victim has confirmed that he did attempt to attack my province from the target province and he was confused about why his armies didn't attack.
I think this is the explanation in this case. I have seen this many times. Two armies attacking each other obviously has a chance to cancel each others movement.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old October 19th, 2009, 07:39 PM
vfb's Avatar

vfb vfb is offline
General
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
vfb is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The Movement Bug: An Arguement Against MP?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fantomen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiel View Post
Finally, my intended victim has confirmed that he did attempt to attack my province from the target province and he was confused about why his armies didn't attack.
I think this is the explanation in this case. I have seen this many times. Two armies attacking each other obviously has a chance to cancel each others movement.
By "cancel each others movement" do you mean "cancel the movement of both armies"? When that occurs, it's the movement bug.

But like Sombre says, any piddly little army moving from A->B can stop the movement of a big army moving from B->A, if there is just one fight occurring in B. Each army has a chance to cancel the other's movement, by successfully moving into the other's province. If the turn resolves, and the big army stayed in B and the little army stayed in A, and everyone just sat around drinking tea and looking at flowers, that's the movement bug.

I also agree that the movement bug can rear its ugly head even when there is no visible enemy army, and it also shows up when there is an enemy army that does not have orders to move anywhere.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.