OT: but Mr. Architect, why can't you make a perfect world?

[thejeff]

Great, then ditch the idea of infinite resources. Because that's just as much a violation of physical law as anything else you've suggested. Especially if you're requiring those infinite resources be things that we would recognize as food, that is plants and animals.

So we essentially agree that a perfect world violates the known laws of our physical universe? No need to keep arguing that it would be tricky to get to the infinite resources that can't exist?

The philosophical discussion of whether perfection can even be defined other than in subjective terms, such as good and bad, can be an interesting one if it isn't sidetracked by arguments about the physical nature of such a world.