OT: Everything I need to know I learned from Conservapedia

[Burnsaber]

You think conservapedia is bad? You are only at the edge of a very dark cliff, but have not even gazed down yet. Look into here (SFW, sort of), and despair, for people are insane.

[Omnirizon]

Originally Posted by Burnsaber

You think conservapedia is bad? You are only at the edge of a very dark cliff, but have not even gazed down yet. Look into here (SFW, sort of), and despair, for people are insane.

They left out one of my favorite wikis: fanwankwiki

http://wiki.fandomwank.com/index.php/Main_Page

more of a specialized (into fandom) than general wiki, but great nonetheless.

Rational wiki is also full of blowhards, in its own way. Just try adding a small hint of a Postmodern perspective to one of their precious articles, and watch the ensuing melt down of sanity. I was about the first person to fill in the article on 'rationalism' from some droll two sentence begging-the-question blurb, to start a discussion and offer a definition of what rationalism was, and some guy went bat****. The article has grown since then, my contribution has been pushed to the bottom (probably since it was the first real contribution to the article) and labeled with 'rationalism according to postmodernism' and had some sort of pre-explanations added for the mentally impaired.

[Graeme Dice]

Edit: Not getting involved in public with the anti-science movement.