|
|
|
 |

July 6th, 2002, 07:06 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?)
Pax: if I have the neural net on my ships, will the training/experience translate to all ships from the ships trained at the training facility?
__________________
 'There are old space jockies and bold space jockies but there ain't no old, bold space jockies'
|

July 6th, 2002, 07:08 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?)
It's really nice when I find one where all three are Atmosphere: None.
Try my Quadrant Mod, and you can get planets with 4 moons.  Much more effecient than a paltry 2 moons. 
|

July 6th, 2002, 08:20 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?)
Pax: if I have the neural net on my ships, will the training/experience translate to all ships from the ships trained at the training facility?
All of the ships need Neural Combat Nets. You can have one ship with 40 exp, and 500 ships with 0 exp. If they all have combat nets, then they all act as if they had 40 exp. They do not get 40 exp, but they get the increased defense and offense bonuses. I think they have to be in a fleet to share the exp, but I am not positive. If only half of the inexperienced ships have Nets, then only they will get the bonus. The other ships will not. If the unexperienced ships have Nets, but the experienced ones do not, then they will not get the exp bonus.
|

July 6th, 2002, 09:08 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?)
"One trick is, if you know of a Ruins planet in an area you cannot hold onto for long -- send a small (1M population) colony mission there. colonise the world, "pop" the ruins ... and then abandon the planet. You get the Ruins' tech, noone else does, and you leave no target behind to be shot at."
Wouldn't it be more entertaining to build a bunch of fighters or mines or a WP?  Roadblock..at least for a little while.
Or just let them glass it; no huge deal. It's only if the planet gets captured that the problems can pop up (your population can be quite useful to other races)
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

July 6th, 2002, 10:33 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Emeryville, CA
Posts: 1,412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?)
Quote:
Originally posted by Pax:
Question 2: for example, "System Robotoid Factory" -- functions similar to a Robotoid Factory of similar level (I, II, or III) for every planet in that system, and ... it stacks with the single-planet-only Robotoid factory. Only one system-wide of each facility will work (though you CAN build more, to guard against losing the bonus if you only one catches an enemy fleet, for example). With both Robotoid Factory III and System Robotoid Factory III, that's a net +60% to each of Minerals, Organics, and Radioactives production. Since the System Robotoid Factory would affect worlds it is NOT built on, that is a very good use of one-facility-only worlds: boost the MANY-facility worlds in the same system.[/QB]
|
I'm pretty sure that System and Planet bonus facilities do not stack anymore. At least they're not in my current v1.49 game...
__________________
GEEK CODE V.3.12: GCS/E d-- s: a-- C++ US+ P+ L++ E--- W+++ N+ !o? K- w-- !O M++ V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t- 5++ X R !tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G+ e+++ h !r*-- y?
SE4 CODE: A-- Se+++* GdY $?/++ Fr! C++* Css Sf Ai Au- M+ MpN S Ss- RV Pw- Fq-- Nd Rp+ G- Mm++ Bb@ Tcp- L+
|

July 6th, 2002, 11:19 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?)
You don't see the system-wide bonus on the planet's description.
You will see it in your budget, though.
Add up your production, and compare it to the reported amount in your empire window.
__________________
Things you want:
|

July 7th, 2002, 03:58 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 442
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?)
Quote:
Originally posted by Ed Kolis:
Abandon the world and leave no target behind to be shot at? Why not keep it and get something out of it - and have an extra target to absorb attacks that might normally be directed at more useful worlds!
|
I was thinking of sending in cloaked colonisers a bit far from your own lines (IOW too far out to provide realistic support after the fact). Drop, grab the world, get the tech, abandon it -- MAYBE before anyone notices you were really there. IF you're lucky. 8)
__________________
-- Sean
-- GMPax
Download the Small Ships mod, v0.1b Beta 2.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|