|
|
|
 |

August 23rd, 2010, 10:37 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starcraft II and Elemental
MoM II has existed in many forms since MoM 1.
Some have reached being playable, but none have reached distribution form that I know of. Most of them are good starts that get destroyed by an effort to make them multiplayer.
Dom IV is still in discussion mode as I understand it. (note that it is not being done by Illwinter)
IW's secret game is only alpha as far as I know and their alpha's tend to require a working knowledge of Finnish which I dont have.
You forgot to mention :
Space Empires Plus, one of which is back to looking for programmers and the other is nearing alpha (neither done by Malfador)
VGA Planets IV which has become overdeveloped for release
Malfador's latest project World Supremacy which is in Apha
|

August 23rd, 2010, 12:19 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 509
Thanks: 84
Thanked 44 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starcraft II and Elemental
There is a lot of feedback, most of it pointing to the game being "fun but unpolished".
http://forums.elementalgame.com/391385
http://forums.elementalgame.com/391443
http://forums.elementalgame.com/391433
(and many more)
Some of the more disturbing stuff is that the "random" maps are not random. The goodies huts are random but you always get some starting resources nearby like fertile land. However the land mass is seeded, meaning that the ocean, mountains, forests, etc. are all static. Kind of takes the wind out of exploration.
Also the tactical combat (which is the biggest draw for me personally) is disabled in multiplayer. It still might be a fun single player game (with time) but I can't see it replacing Dominions.
|

August 23rd, 2010, 01:20 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: France
Posts: 820
Thanks: 4
Thanked 33 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starcraft II and Elemental
Quote:
Originally Posted by sector24
Some of the more disturbing stuff is that the "random" maps are not random. The goodies huts are random but you always get some starting resources nearby like fertile land.
|
This is much like Civ IV. The default random map generators put a lot of additional resources near the player's starting location.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sector24
However the land mass is seeded, meaning that the ocean, mountains, forests, etc. are all static. Kind of takes the wind out of exploration.
|
By seeded, you mean a same seed gives the same result, not that it's always the same seed? Please?
|

August 23rd, 2010, 04:27 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 509
Thanks: 84
Thanked 44 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starcraft II and Elemental
Yes, the same seed will give an identical land mass, just unique goodie huts and resources and neutral monsters, etc. In the current version there are about...15 seeds across all 4 map sizes? Something very small. There is of course the promise of "dozens" of map seeds coming, but still that's not quite random. To equate it to dominions, it's like having dozens of pre-set maps (Parganos, Silent Seas, etc.) but with random magic sites. I would not call that random map generation, and I don't think any Dominions player would either.
|

August 23rd, 2010, 08:16 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starcraft II and Elemental
Quote:
Originally Posted by sector24
Yes, the same seed will give an identical land mass, just unique goodie huts and resources and neutral monsters, etc. In the current version there are about...15 seeds across all 4 map sizes? Something very small. There is of course the promise of "dozens" of map seeds coming, but still that's not quite random. To equate it to dominions, it's like having dozens of pre-set maps (Parganos, Silent Seas, etc.) but with random magic sites. I would not call that random map generation, and I don't think any Dominions player would either.
|
Pros and Cons. There are times that I wish the mapgen in Dom3 would take a seed.
There is usually a seed. You just dont always get access to it. Unless it randomly reseeds in mid generation its the same whether you know there is a seed or not. Creating a true random in programming languages is a history subject all its own.
And a seed generally means at least 65535 options. Thats alot of maps.
If properly used a seeded generator can create a map hundreds of times larger than other games without adding to the size of the game, cpu load, or memory use.
Last edited by Gandalf Parker; August 23rd, 2010 at 08:31 PM..
|

August 23rd, 2010, 09:04 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 509
Thanks: 84
Thanked 44 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starcraft II and Elemental
To be honest I don't consider Sourceforge and similar projects to be successors in any tangible way. If you don't own the intellectual rights to the project, you can't make the sequel. You can certainly make something, but when everyone is a volunteer the odds of any project going all the way to completion go way down.
As far as the seeds go, I do understand how they are supposed to work. However, the way Stardock talked about them it seems like only certain seeds have valid resources surrounding the starting areas. Since not all seeds are valid, we have to rely on them to provide them for us. Technically you can delete the seed altogether and create a totally random map, or use a manual brute force attack to generate all maps and then manually check which ones work for you. I think that's only for people who want to play Elemental: War of Boredom.
|

August 23rd, 2010, 10:27 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starcraft II and Elemental
Quote:
Originally Posted by sector24
To be honest I don't consider Sourceforge and similar projects to be successors in any tangible way. If you don't own the intellectual rights to the project, you can't make the sequel. You can certainly make something, but when everyone is a volunteer the odds of any project going all the way to completion go way down.
|
I fully agree. In fact, I mentioned it in another thread where they were discussing how great games would be if the devs listened to the community. Im not against it. But everything has its pros and cons. Open projects tend to show the other side of that argument at a high percentage.
But it still makes a good hunting ground. Sometimes one of them will actually get to a working alpha. They are often just messing around with it but once it gets there you can talk to them about going legit. Sometimes it involves giving up the games working name for a completely new one and dropping some other too-close-to-hide characteristics of the old game but if they want to continue onward to a marketable product they can.
But like I say, until they have a working playable alpha its usually not worth talking to them. 90% of them fall out before doing any real code.
Quote:
As far as the seeds go, I do understand how they are supposed to work. However, the way Stardock talked about them it seems like only certain seeds have valid resources surrounding the starting areas. Since not all seeds are valid, we have to rely on them to provide them for us. Technically you can delete the seed altogether and create a totally random map, or use a manual brute force attack to generate all maps and then manually check which ones work for you. I think that's only for people who want to play Elemental: War of Boredom.
|
Thats sucks. Ive gotten used to developers not making good use of seeds but that sounds like not even making average use of it. On the other hand, changing out the seed-feed for a generator is something that can easily be done at the last minute so maybe its just that way now for testing purposes (I hope). Well Brads fame has always been AI, not maps.
|

August 23rd, 2010, 12:46 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Posts: 1,333
Thanks: 39
Thanked 59 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starcraft II and Elemental
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf Parker
Dom IV is still in discussion mode as I understand it. (note that it is not being done by Illwinter)
|
What? Where? How? When? Who? (And possibly some other one-word questions too.) This is new info, right? Haven't heard anything about it before.
|

August 23rd, 2010, 07:30 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Me a viking
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 81
Thanked 122 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starcraft II and Elemental
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf Parker
MoM II has existed in many forms since MoM 1.
Some have reached being playable, but none have reached distribution form that I know of. Most of them are good starts that get destroyed by an effort to make them multiplayer.
|
Unless you can give at least one link to an example of this I'm going to assume you're making this up.
Quote:
Dom IV is still in discussion mode as I understand it. (note that it is not being done by Illwinter)
|
You mean we're sometimes whining about how much we'd like it made? I wouldn't call that "discussion mode"
Quote:
IW's secret game is only alpha as far as I know and their alpha's tend to require a working knowledge of Finnish which I dont have.
|
They're Swedish, like me. Not finnish, completely different languages. So if you have the slightest idea where I could use my extraordinary linguistic skills to find out more on the alpha I'd be more than happy to translate for you. Or perhaps the problem is rather the whole "secret" thing? You know, them not wanting anyone, including you, to know about it.
__________________
Voice of ***** and her spicy crew!
|

August 23rd, 2010, 08:05 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starcraft II and Elemental
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fantomen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf Parker
MoM II has existed in many forms since MoM 1.
Some have reached being playable, but none have reached distribution form that I know of. Most of them are good starts that get destroyed by an effort to make them multiplayer.
|
Unless you can give at least one link to an example of this I'm going to assume you're making this up.
|
Any that are being done semi-professionally I dont care to give you. And tho I gave up on most of them but if you put Master of Magic into a search on sites like SourceForge you can easily find large projects in various stages of completion. Feel free to join any you wish. But like I said, most tend to start off good then try to go MP and fall apart. Im still hoping for one that just completes the working-version stage before going off topic (come to think of it, isnt Elemental itself an example of that? So why did you ask?)
Actually speaking of SourceForge and any of the other Open Source or Cloud Project sites...
Anyone here who is interested in getting in as a programmer, graphics, sound, or just general idea-discussion; take any old game that you really liked and do a search of project sites like these. If you loved it then chances are that someone else did also. There are many projects trying to resurrect old classics.
Quote:
Quote:
Dom IV is still in discussion mode as I understand it. (note that it is not being done by Illwinter)
|
You mean we're sometimes whining about how much we'd like it made? I wouldn't call that "discussion mode"
|
Thats funny. I thought that Dom3Mods had one. 
Most of the ones I was thinking of the discussion is in IRC. Of course, I tend to be less of a cheerleader than a naysayer. And I wouldnt say that any have reached any serious levels. In fact, until at LEAST an alpha playable version exists I dont bother contacting most projects.
Quote:
Quote:
IW's secret game is only alpha as far as I know and their alpha's tend to require a working knowledge of Finnish which I dont have.
|
They're Swedish, like me. Not finnish, completely different languages. So if you have the slightest idea where I could use my extraordinary linguistic skills to find out more on the alpha I'd be more than happy to translate for you. Or perhaps the problem is rather the whole "secret" thing? You know, them not wanting anyone, including you, to know about it.
|
No I dont think so. I really dont picture you in the alpha group.
Last edited by Gandalf Parker; August 23rd, 2010 at 08:35 PM..
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|