|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |

November 19th, 2011, 01:16 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 53
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: What is wrong with RPGs?
The German Panzerfaust 3,PzF 3-IT,PzF 3-IT seem to have very good heat penetration and accuracy.
Weapon Tube Heat Penetration Accuracy
PzF 3 RPG 70 5
PzF 3-IT RPG 90 15
PzF 3T DC RPG 80 10
M2 Carl-G Rifled 40 6
M3 Carl-G Rifled 50 6
RPG-7 RPG 33 5
RPG-7V RPG 50 5
AT4/A Smooth 42 5
AT4/B Smooth 60 5
For the cost/specs the PzF 3 has got to be the most deadly Inf section AT weapon you can have SPMBT
|

November 20th, 2011, 12:16 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: What is wrong with RPGs?
Yeah I'd forgot the PzF 3, excellent weapon.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|

November 21st, 2011, 12:22 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 207
Thanks: 24
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: What is wrong with RPGs?
The RPG-2, RPG-7 and so forth were pretty much developments of the Panzerfaust concept of a simple, man portable weapon that could be issued to the infantry squad and probably stuck around as much because it's a simple, efficient weapon, that was well understood.
Soviet armaments were chosen as much for their suitability to equip a mass army and conduct a "people's war" as anything else.
Considering the lifespan and service life of the RPG-7, it's hard to say they were wrong, and there's a lot of newer, more potent models out there.
|

November 22nd, 2011, 06:15 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 385
Thanks: 1
Thanked 76 Times in 67 Posts
|
|
Re: What is wrong with RPGs?
Quote:
Originally Posted by runequester
The RPG-2, RPG-7 and so forth were pretty much developments of the Panzerfaust concept of a simple, man portable weapon that could be issued to the infantry squad and probably stuck around as much because it's a simple, efficient weapon, that was well understood.
|
I would say that RPG-2 and RPG-7 as crew-served, reloadable anti-tank rocket launchers are conceptually closer to the humble US bazooka (which BTW was supplied to the USSR in small numbers as part of the lend-lease trade).
Panzerfaust concept of a single shot, disposable anti-tank weapon operated by a single person is seen in a number of other post-WWII weapons, such as M72 LAW, AT-4, APILAS and RPG-18.
|

November 22nd, 2011, 09:59 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Die Operasionale Gebied
Posts: 375
Thanks: 108
Thanked 88 Times in 58 Posts
|
|
Re: What is wrong with RPGs?
When I was in the SADF back in the Seventies, we used RPGs when we got them. The Terrs had no tanks, but RPGs will slot a bunker. And unlike with a bunker bomb, you can do the bunker from a safer distance.
troopie
__________________
Pamwe Chete
|

January 15th, 2012, 02:43 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,869
Thanks: 812
Thanked 1,368 Times in 1,024 Posts
|
|
Re: What is wrong with RPGs?
Wanted to find a home for this article so used the search mode, it seems a good place. It's an article on the JAVELIN a good article. At present though it's in an abbreviated form though normally they do unlock them in time.
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...missile-03440/
Regards,
Pat
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|