|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 1st, 2002, 06:39 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
						Posts: 738
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 RCEs & Non-Newtonian in a QNP Universe 
 Edit: Three questions
 1) at what number of movement points does RCE happen?
 
 2) does RCE only occur during normal movement, or does it happen during combat too? (that is, could an afterburner-like component(s) cause RCE?)
 
 3) if movement bonus is used instead of movement points, will I get RCE?
 
 If this works, I'm hoping to make a series of "reactionless" or "inertialess" drives for a QNP world [Ancient Tech]
 
 Thanks
 
 [ August 01, 2002, 05:41: Message edited by: jimbob ]
 
				__________________Jimbob
 
 The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
 -Linus Pauling
 Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
 -Søren Kierkegaard
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 1st, 2002, 07:28 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 5,085
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: RCEs & Non-Newtonian in a QNP Universe 
 "1) at what number of movement points does RCE happen?"
 256. 255 is fine, 256 is not.
 
 "2) does RCE only occur during normal movement, or does it happen during combat too? (that is, could an afterburner-like component(s) cause RCE?)"
 
 Combat move is seperate. I'd bet money on the game belching a RCE if you go over 255 move total in any situation though. (i.e. 255 standard move + 255 afterburner = probable crash)
 
 "3) if movement bonus is used instead of movement points, will I get RCE?"
 
 Probably not unless the total movement goes over 255. Not engine move, ship moves.
 
 Phoenix-D
 
				__________________ 
				Phoenix-D
 
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation. 
-Digger |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 1st, 2002, 07:28 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 
						Posts: 11,451
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: RCEs & Non-Newtonian in a QNP Universe 
 The 256th standard movement point will cause the RCE.This triggers when the ship is being designed.
 
 Bonus movement does not count towards the RCE.
 
 But a ship with a total movement after engines per move of more than 255 might cause an RCE as well.
 (But who would allow a ship like that in their mod???)
 
				__________________ 
				Things you want: |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 1st, 2002, 07:51 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
						Posts: 738
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: RCEs & Non-Newtonian in a QNP Universe 
 
	Bwahhaaahhaahhaahhaaa....Quote: 
	
		| (But who would allow a ship like that in their mod???) |  
 Er, no actually, I won't.
 
 Anyway, thanks for the help. So in summary 1)a BattleMoon can only move 1 per turn without RCE problems then, and 2) RCE is for # of move points (before total movement, but excluding bonus movement).
				__________________Jimbob
 
 The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
 -Linus Pauling
 Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
 -Søren Kierkegaard
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 1st, 2002, 04:50 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 
						Posts: 11,451
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: RCEs & Non-Newtonian in a QNP Universe 
 1) Battlemoons get one MP, unless you have the propulsion experts trait     
2) Yes.  Number of move points, before dividing by the "engines per move" setting.
				__________________ 
				Things you want: |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 2nd, 2002, 02:30 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
						Posts: 738
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: RCEs & Non-Newtonian in a QNP Universe 
 Ok, thanks.
 Now, as to the (soon?) to be released gold patch.  Will it be possible to dictate which ships a component can be used on, or is it only possible to exclude mount types by ship size/type?
 
				__________________Jimbob
 
 The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
 -Linus Pauling
 Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
 -Søren Kierkegaard
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 2nd, 2002, 02:37 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 
						Posts: 11,451
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: RCEs & Non-Newtonian in a QNP Universe 
 You can restrict a mount to a single hull, but individual components, no. 
				__________________ 
				Things you want: |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 2nd, 2002, 04:29 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ohio 
						Posts: 8,450
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: RCEs & Non-Newtonian in a QNP Universe 
 
	Well, there is a convoluted way to do it actually. Make your component too large to fit on any available hull size, and then make a mount that is family specifc so it can be used for that component only and using size max and min to make it only usable on that hull. And make it so that it decreases the size enough so that it will fit. However this won't work if you have any other similer mounts that are allowed to be used for any components.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by jimbob: Ok, thanks.
 
 Now, as to the (soon?) to be released gold patch.  Will it be possible to dictate which ships a component can be used on, or is it only possible to exclude mount types by ship size/type?
 |  
 Geo
				__________________I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
 Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 2nd, 2002, 07:57 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
						Posts: 738
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: RCEs & Non-Newtonian in a QNP Universe 
 Ooooo...now that's just plain brilliant Geo!
 thanks for all the help y'all.
 
				__________________Jimbob
 
 The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
 -Linus Pauling
 Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
 -Søren Kierkegaard
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 2nd, 2002, 05:32 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 3,013
					 Thanks: 17 
		
			
				Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: RCEs & Non-Newtonian in a QNP Universe 
 
	Well, if you wanted to make the equivalent of the SW galaxy gun it could work.Quote: 
	
		| But a ship with a total movement after engines per move of more than 255 might cause an RCE as well. (But who would allow a ship like that in their mod???)[/QB]
 |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |