Nap-3

[dojango]

spies are definitely a cassus belli and a legit pretext to break an NAP. Scouts are not. Direct overcasting of a global, sounds like there's room to disagree on it. I would say that it isn't a violation of the NAP, because it isn't an aggressive action aimed at the other party.

[bbz]

Originally Posted by dojango

spies are definitely a cassus belli and a legit pretext to break an NAP. Scouts are not. Direct overcasting of a global, sounds like there's room to disagree on it. I would say that it isn't a violation of the NAP, because it isn't an aggressive action aimed at the other party.

Would you say that if someone targets your global with a dispel that is violation of the NAP?

Direct overcast of the global is no different than dispel with the added benefit for the person that is casting it that he gets a global up.

[dojango]

Originally Posted by bbz

Would you say that if someone targets your global with a dispel that is violation of the NAP?

Direct overcast of the global is no different than dispel with the added benefit for the person that is casting it that he gets a global up.

Well, like I say, there can be disagreement over it. If you wanted to use it as a cassus belli and a de facto break of the NAP without triggering the 3 turn warning, go for it. After all, the best time to end an NAP-3 is when you can do it without giving notice.