.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPMBT > TO&Es
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 18th, 2013, 10:08 PM

sabresandy sabresandy is offline
Private
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 38
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
sabresandy is on a distinguished road
Default Re: APC Development and related topics.

I'm sorry to nitpick, and I'll try to clarify, but: none of those articles address the problem with the Stryker vehicles. They cover future upgraded versions, yes, and I'll be looking forward to those, assuming they get fielded.

The issue is with the basic version of the Stryker, OBAT 12 UNIT 335, and its GL-equipped variant, UNIT 351, plus the cage armor versions thereof, UNIT 680 and 681.

The MG-equipped versions, 335 and 680, are armed with WEAPON 55, the .50cal AAMG, which is a Class 4 (FLAK/AA) weapon. The issue I had in mind was that this should not be correct, since they use remote weapons stations instead of a pintle mount. They should be using Class 5, CMG/BMG, or even Class 19, AUTOCANNON, to reflect that fact.

The same applies to the grenade launcher variants, 351 and 681. Their weapon mountings are Class 3, Team Weapons, which is affected by buttoning; they should be in Class 5 or Class 19 (5 makes a little more sense since the grenade launcher isn't an anti-helicopter weapon except at very short ranges), again, to reflect the fact that RWSes are immune to buttoning.

Regardless, though, I'll be pretty excited to see the new Stryker variants with better armor, stabilization, thermal sights, possible Javelin integration, all that. But I would like to see the existing old Strykers to be corrected as well.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 19th, 2013, 03:20 AM
FASTBOAT TOUGH's Avatar

FASTBOAT TOUGH FASTBOAT TOUGH is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,859
Thanks: 803
Thanked 1,361 Times in 1,018 Posts
FASTBOAT TOUGH is on a distinguished road
Fallout Re: APC Development and related topics.

Weapons are more my thing, weapons classes are not per say though I guess that might be an oxymoron. Though I understand what you want, my ref A (Just the way I get when tired.) from my post did answer the weapon issue. I'll take it further from that with the below with pics.

1. Basic STYRKER all were from the beginning equipped with the PROTECTOR RWS using either the 50 cal. or 40mm GL.
http://www.military-today.com/apc/stryker.htm
Click image for larger version

Name:	stryker.jpg
Views:	329
Size:	54.2 KB
ID:	12763

2. M1128 MGS has a 105mm with a turret mounted 50 cal. and 7.62mm gun. The pic shows the 50 cal. clearly.
http://www.military-today.com/artillery/stryker_mgs.htm
Click image for larger version

Name:	stryker_mgs.jpg
Views:	338
Size:	50.3 KB
ID:	12764

3. M1129 MORTAR Carrier has a roof mounted 7.62mm.
http://www.military-today.com/artill...ker_mortar.htm
Click image for larger version

Name:	m1129_stryker_mortar.jpg
Views:	228
Size:	94.4 KB
ID:	12765

4. M1134 ATM TOW has a 7.62mm mounted by the commanders hatch. The USMC and USA versions will be around longer then the game allows for currently. Both are testing with newer weapons systems to include the ITAS TOW. That'll be an issue for next year.
http://www.military-today.com/missil...34_stryker.htm
Click image for larger version

Name:	m1134_stryker.jpg
Views:	275
Size:	67.1 KB
ID:	12766

So it would appear something might be amiss without doing an OOB check.

Regards,
Pat
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.