Usmc oob

[FASTBOAT TOUGH]

Have we forgotten how to read?
Concerning #1: I clearly stated the issue of accuracy was not practical but the player could "control" that through the game options section. This is about the CORPS and others having the capability of using an AT Cargo munitions round that is readily available in the field then and now.

Concerning #2: This is the mission of SOCOM/USA. The "purists" wouldn't use them at all. You and the game would save slots we're likely to need in the next few years. You had made the inference yourself about NAVAIR being the decision maker for all air in an issue I was discussing with Don a while back-so what's changed now and against any reference on this helo and the next. When have we ever not been driven by ourselves and others to be as accurate as possible in our equipment submissions or changes? Don has held to this standard that I embrace as well anyway. If we can't do that to some degree we might as well play any other wargame you disliked instead. These are the issues that separate these (Our) games from the rest out there. Even in the game reviews I've words like "accuracy", "detailed" and "frequently updated" are attributed to the equipment and other issues in the game.

Concerning #3: Your "The unit classification is based on the mission they're outfitted to perform NOT the actual official classification of the helo." kind of fits what you said about the CH-53 being primarily a resupply bird I guess we should delete them then? And they do and can carry those troops in that weapons configuration even NAVAIR says that. The rest I would refer you back to #2.

We work hard all of us that do this work for the many countless hours and in some cases sacrifices to our personal lives. We therefore owe it to the players to get it as right as we can (And none of us are perfect in that regard but, we try our collective best to be.) and leave the final decision to the player as to what they want to use or not use.

Regards,
Pat