.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPMBT
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 10th, 2018, 12:46 AM

jp10 jp10 is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Posts: 177
Thanks: 21
Thanked 69 Times in 48 Posts
jp10 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Question on infantry SAMs

Might do better checking the combat record of Blowpipes in real life. They were not very effective with a minimum range of .5Km (10 hexes in game) and a MCLOS guidance system.
The Falklands War saw 95 missiles fired by the British. A later report determined that only two kills could be attributed to Blowpipe: A British Harrier attacked by the Argentine Army and an Argentine Aermacchi.

The Blowpipe was found to be particularly ineffective when used to engage a crossing target or to chase a target moving rapidly away from the operator.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 10th, 2018, 02:19 AM
shahadi's Avatar

shahadi shahadi is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: I ain't in Kansas anymore, just north of where Dorothy clicked her heels is where you'll find me.
Posts: 878
Thanks: 584
Thanked 277 Times in 191 Posts
shahadi is on a distinguished road
Post Re: Question on infantry SAMs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jp10 View Post
Might do better checking the combat record of Blowpipes in real life. They were not very effective with a minimum range of .5Km (10 hexes in game) and a MCLOS guidance system.
The Falklands War saw 95 missiles fired by the British. A later report determined that only two kills could be attributed to Blowpipe: A British Harrier attacked by the Argentine Army and an Argentine Aermacchi.

The Blowpipe was found to be particularly ineffective when used to engage a crossing target or to chase a target moving rapidly away from the operator.
Interesting.

I compared the accuracy of the Blowpipe to the FIN-92 Stinger, the Starstreak, and the Javelin SAM, although only the Blowpipe was available in 1979, I wonder if the accuracy rating of the Blowpipe is resulting in it's poor performance as well as the short range (weapon range is 70).


Accuracy
070 Blowpipe
100 FIN-92 Stinger
120 Starstreak
120 Javelin SAM

So, given jp10's reporting and the accuracy value within the game, the Blowpipe should perform poorly. Maybe, if the target was flying directly at the Blowpipe team, the hit percentage may increase, otherwise, it is a poor weapon system in the game as it was in real life.


Attached Images
File Type: jpg Blowpipe_OOB.JPG (82.4 KB, 584 views)
File Type: jpg FIM-92_Stinger.JPG (96.8 KB, 320 views)
File Type: jpg Javelin-SAM.JPG (93.8 KB, 278 views)
File Type: jpg Starstreak-SAM.JPG (65.4 KB, 291 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 11th, 2018, 08:26 AM

jivemi jivemi is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 505
Thanks: 432
Thanked 149 Times in 104 Posts
jivemi is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Question on infantry SAMs

[quote=shahadi;841716]
Quote:
Originally Posted by jp10 View Post
Maybe, if the target was flying directly at the Blowpipe team, the hit percentage may increase, otherwise, it is a poor weapon system in the game as it was in real life.

A bit off-topic, but in WINSP are targets moving ACROSS the firing unit's LOS more difficult to hit than those moving directly towards or away from them? My impression was that target size. speed and elevation were the prime variables. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.