.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPWW2
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 29th, 2019, 06:30 PM

mccarty.geoff mccarty.geoff is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mccarty.geoff is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Flak issue

It's cool that there is an accuracy slider which can be used to reduce hits. Problem is that a rifle squad can effectively suppress targets at 500m (waste of ammo though). The default threshold between suppression and a hit is too slim causing unrealistic extreme range mass casualties for WW2 forces who were most often poorly supplied. Isn't a major game play problem but, lower ranges and hit percentages would better model WW2 standoff and closed engagements.
Gun shields and 1cm and less armor plate is mostly for protecting morale. An 8mm machine gun burst on an American pack howitzer's gun shield will rumple and penetrate for instance. Just like how vehicles are being penetrated by ammo they're supposedly rated against in recent wars. Velocity trumps stasis every time. The gun shield or any large equipment should have some defensive bonus though.
My problem with pack guns and mortars is if they're travelling on foot than how are the teams managing to haul dozens of shells or bombs?

Last edited by mccarty.geoff; May 29th, 2019 at 06:47 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 29th, 2019, 09:26 PM

jivemi jivemi is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 505
Thanks: 432
Thanked 149 Times in 104 Posts
jivemi is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Flak issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by mccarty.geoff View Post
It's cool that there is an accuracy slider which can be used to reduce hits. Problem is that a rifle squad can effectively suppress targets at 500m (waste of ammo though). The default threshold between suppression and a hit is too slim causing unrealistic extreme range mass casualties for WW2 forces who were most often poorly supplied. Isn't a major game play problem but, lower ranges and hit percentages would better model WW2 standoff and closed engagements.
Probably true, but then battles would last much longer. Who wants to spend hours of real time playing out "realistic" platoon or company engagements lasting maybe 100 turns or more? And never mind battalion level or higher.

As has been noted before this is a wargame not a simulation. There is enough internal consistency in the combat results to provide a good measure of comparison among weapons systems while allowing replication of real-world tactics to achieve decisive results in the time allotted.

Cheers and happy gaming.

Last edited by jivemi; May 30th, 2019 at 03:36 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.