|
|
|
 |

August 22nd, 2002, 09:32 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 131
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PING: Atrocities
You have my complete support. I use the Klingon and Romulan sets almost every game, and many of the others as well.
|

August 22nd, 2002, 09:39 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas, yall
Posts: 956
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PING: Atrocities
Quote:
Originally posted by Atrocities:
Like I said, thanks, but there really is nothing to worry about. That "thing" sent me copies off all the emeils he has sent out. He is a natural born jerk. I think he is from STGN, a star trek site that hosts one of the largest collections of jerks known to exsist. I promoted SEIV there and was flamed heavily for my ship sets. I think they enjoyed it, and I stopped posting. I think this guy is from there, and just wanted to keep things going. Thanks guys, but the site is not down. It is being fixed. I figured to kill two birds with one stone, and it has seemed to work. Now that this guy thinks my site is down, he will assume he has won, and move on. In a few days I will re-open the site.
Some of the letter this guy sent to Angelfire were, very odd.
I just got tired of listening to his crap.
|
Atrocities,
Are you saying that your ISP did nothing to your site, and that you took it down yourself?
|

August 22nd, 2002, 09:42 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PING: Atrocities
Quote:
Originally posted by kalthalior:
You have my complete support. I use the Klingon and Romulan sets almost every game, and many of the others as well.
|
I wanted to say that I like the Romulan and Klingon shipsets as well. I often find it fun to play against just them. The ships are clean, well defined, and distinctive, while at the same time detailed and with some unique character. That is sometimes not the case with a shipset.
I almost wanted to say that they were a good adaptation of Star Trek, and it is true. It's just that saying that makes me sound like some lifeless loveless Trekie.
[ August 22, 2002, 21:42: Message edited by: Arkcon ]
|

August 22nd, 2002, 09:53 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PING: Atrocities
"Are you saying that your ISP did nothing to your site, and that you took it down yourself?"
Yeah man, if this is the case then man did it work. Brilliant idea though.
__________________
Ragnarok - Hevordian Story Thread
-------------------
I think...therefore I am confused.
They were armed. With guns, said Omari.
Canadians. With guns. And a warship. What is this world coming to?
The dreaded derelict dwelling two ton devil bunny!
Every ship can be a minesweeper... Once
|

August 22nd, 2002, 09:59 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 185
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PING: Atrocities
Atrocites
I have some space 25megs +/- on my server you are very welcome to use if necessary. And since it is my server, it cannot be turned off.
Cheers!
Trajan
__________________
'To slander, Trajan paid little heed, and he was no slave of anger.'
-Dio Cassius, Book LXVIII
|

August 22nd, 2002, 10:02 PM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Lancaster, OH 43130
Posts: 1,997
Thanks: 5
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: PING: Atrocities
He's already threatened us with turning us into the SBA, and launching an Online campaign against us if we don't turn his account on in 24 hours.
I think that email alone proves that he needs to take some time to chill out.
__________________
Change is inevitable, how you handle change is controllable - J. Strong
|

August 22nd, 2002, 10:28 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PING: Atrocities
Who is the SBA?
Realistically, he broke the rules of the forum, which was stated before you signed in an account. The Moderators have their complete rights in banning him and they have discretion in the range of the rules.
He can realistically do whatever he wants, but I don't think he will get much support, since fringe radicals are only a small number, and it takes the moderate majority to do anything substantial on the web.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|